Re: [PATCH] cxl/mbox: Fix CEL logic for poison and security commands

[Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>]

On Sun, 03 Sep 2023 14:42:58 -0700
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> wrote:

> The following debug output was observed while testing CXL
> 
> cxl_core:cxl_walk_cel:721: cxl_mock_mem cxl_mem.0: Opcode 0x4300 unsupported by driver
> 
> opcode 0x4300 (Get Poison) is supported by the driver and the mock
> device supports it.  The logic should be checking that the opcode is
> both not poison and not security.
> 
> Fix the logic to allow poison and security commands.
> 
> Fixes: ad64f5952ce3 ("cxl/memdev: Only show sanitize sysfs files when supported")
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>

Makes sense.
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> index ca60bb8114f2..b315bdab9197 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> @@ -716,8 +716,8 @@ static void cxl_walk_cel(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, size_t size, u8 *cel)
>  		u16 opcode = le16_to_cpu(cel_entry[i].opcode);
>  		struct cxl_mem_command *cmd = cxl_mem_find_command(opcode);
>  
> -		if (!cmd && (!cxl_is_poison_command(opcode) ||
> -			     !cxl_is_security_command(opcode))) {
> +		if (!cmd && !cxl_is_poison_command(opcode) &&
> +		    !cxl_is_security_command(opcode)) {
>  			dev_dbg(dev,
>  				"Opcode 0x%04x unsupported by driver\n", opcode);
>  			continue;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 1c59d383390f970b891b503b7f79b63a02db2ec5
> change-id: 20230903-cxl-cel-fix-9da269bf0f21
> 
> Best regards,