From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <Swapnil.Sapkal@amd.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched: Rate limit migrations to 1 per 2ms per task
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 10:44:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230906084455.GD38741@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <866f23cc-6725-fc74-099f-450939fc0dc4@efficios.com>
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 05:16:25PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> On 9/5/23 16:28, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 13:11 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > Rate limit migrations to 1 migration per 2 milliseconds per task. On a
> > > kernel with EEVDF scheduler (commit b97d64c722598ffed42ece814a2cb791336c6679),
> > > this speeds up hackbench from 62s to 45s on AMD EPYC 192-core (over 2 sockets).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > index 479db611f46e..0d294fce261d 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > > @@ -4510,6 +4510,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
> > > p->se.vruntime = 0;
> > > p->se.vlag = 0;
> > > p->se.slice = sysctl_sched_base_slice;
> > > + p->se.next_migration_time = 0;
> >
> > It seems like the next_migration_time should be initialized to the current time,
> > in case the system run for a long time and clock wrap around could cause problem.
>
> next_migration_time is a u64, which should "never" overflow. Other scheduler
> code comparing with sched_clock() don't appear to care about u64 overflow.
Much code actually considers overflow. We also have monotonicity filters
where it really matters.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-06 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-05 17:11 [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched/eevdf: Rate limit task migration Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-09-05 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched: Rate limit migrations to 1 per 2ms per task Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-09-05 20:28 ` Tim Chen
2023-09-05 21:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-09-05 22:44 ` Tim Chen
2023-09-06 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-06 20:51 ` Tim Chen
2023-09-06 21:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-09-06 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-09-06 13:58 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-09-06 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-06 13:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-09-06 15:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-09-10 7:03 ` Chen Yu
2023-09-13 15:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-09-05 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] sched: Implement adaptative rate limiting of task migrations Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230906084455.GD38741@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Swapnil.Sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox