* [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs
@ 2023-09-06 16:02 Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2023-09-06 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Douglas Anderson,
gautham.shenoy, jpoimboe, keescook, linux-kernel, mingo, philmd,
samitolvanen, scott, vschneid
This is an attempt to resurrect Sumit's old patch series [1] that
allowed us to use the arm64 pseudo-NMI to get backtraces of CPUs and
also to round up CPUs in kdb/kgdb. The last post from Sumit that I
could find was v7, so I started my series at v8. I haven't copied all
of his old changelongs here, but you can find them from the link.
This patch series targets v6.6. Specifically it can't land in v6.5
since it depends on commit 8d539b84f1e3 ("nmi_backtrace: allow
excluding an arbitrary CPU").
It should be noted that Mark still feels there might be some corner
cases where pseudo-NMI is not production ready [2] [3], but as far as
I'm aware there are no concrete/documented issues. Regardless of
whether this should be enabled for production, though, this series
will be invaluable to anyone trying to debug crashes on arm64
machines.
v13 of this series fixes a nit with the names of two functions and
collects more tags. There are no code changes other than the renames
and these have no functional impact. I believe that the series is
ready to land. As per the note in patch #1, I'm hoping for an Ack from
Marc Zyngier on patch #1 and then the whole series can land through
the arm64 tree.
v12 of this series collects tags, fixes a few small nits in comments
and commit messages from v11 and adds a new (and somewhat unrelated)
small patch to the end of the series. There are no code changes other
than the last patch, which is tiny.
v11 of this series addressed Stephen Boyd's feedback on v10 and added
a missing "static" that the patches robot found.
v10 of this series attempted to address all of Mark's feedback on
v9. As a quick summary:
- It includes his patch to remove IPI_WAKEUP, freeing up an extra IPI.
- It no longer combines the "kgdb" and "backtrace" IPIs. If we need
another IPI these could always be recombined later.
- It promotes IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP to NMI.
- It puts nearly all the code directly in smp.c.
- Several of the patches are squashed together.
- Patch #6 ("kgdb: Provide a stub kgdb_nmicallback() if !CONFIG_KGDB")
was dropped from the series since it landed.
Between v8 and v9, I had cleaned up this patch series by integrating
the 10th patch from v8 [4] into the whole series. As part of this, I
renamed the "NMI IPI" to the "debug IPI" since it could now be backed
by a regular IPI in the case that pseudo NMIs weren't available. With
the fallback, this allowed me to drop some extra patches from the
series. This feels (to me) to be pretty clean and hopefully others
agree. Any patch I touched significantly I removed Masayoshi and
Chen-Yu's tags from.
...also in v8, I reorderd the patches a bit in a way that seemed a
little cleaner to me.
Since v7, I have:
* Addressed the small amount of feedback that was there for v7.
* Rebased.
* Added a new patch that prevents us from spamming the logs with idle
tasks.
* Added an extra patch to gracefully fall back to regular IPIs if
pseudo-NMIs aren't there.
It can be noted that this patch series works very well with the recent
"hardlockup" patches that have landed through Andrew Morton's tree and
are currently in mainline. It works especially well with the "buddy"
lockup detector.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1604317487-14543-1-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZFvGqD%2F%2Fpm%2FlZb+p@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZNDKVP2m-iiZCz3v@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230419155341.v8.10.Ic3659997d6243139d0522fc3afcdfd88d7a5f030@changeid/
Changes in v13:
- s/_idx/_index/ on the patch to make function names consistent.
Changes in v12:
- ("arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init") new for v12.
- Added a comment about why we account for 16 SGIs when Linux uses 8.
- Minor comment change to add "()" after nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace.
- Updated the commit hash of the commit this depends on.
Changes in v11:
- Adjust comment about NR_IPI/MAX_IPI.
- Don't use confusing "backed by" idiom in comment.
- Made arm64_backtrace_ipi() static.
- Updated commit message as per Stephen.
- arch_send_wakeup_ipi() now takes an unsigned int.
Changes in v10:
- ("IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI") new for v10.
- ("arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI") new for v10.
- Backtrace now directly supported in smp.c
- Don't allocate the cpumask on the stack; just iterate.
- Moved kgdb calls to smp.c to avoid needing to export IPI info.
- Rewrite as needed for 5.11+ as per Mark Rutland and Sumit.
- Squash backtrace into patch adding support for pseudo-NMI IPIs.
- kgdb now has its own IPI.
Changes in v9:
- Added comments that we might not be using NMI always.
- Added to commit message that this doesn't catch all cases.
- Fold in v8 patch #10 ("Fallback to a regular IPI if NMI isn't enabled")
- Moved header file out of "include" since it didn't need to be there.
- Remove arm64_supports_nmi()
- Remove fallback for when debug IPI isn't available.
- Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by NMI.
- arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace() no longer returns bool
Changes in v8:
- "Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle" new for v8
- Removed "#ifdef CONFIG_SMP" since arm64 is always SMP
- debug_ipi_setup() and debug_ipi_teardown() no longer take cpu param
Douglas Anderson (6):
irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs
arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle
arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI
arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI
arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI
roundup
arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init
Mark Rutland (1):
arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI
arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h | 3 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 4 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c | 4 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 59 ++++++---
6 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-06 16:02 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-12 12:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2023-09-06 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Douglas Anderson,
Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-kernel
As of commit 6abbd6988971 ("irqchip/gic, gic-v3: Make SGIs use
handle_percpu_devid_irq()") SGIs are treated the same as PPIs/EPPIs
and use handle_percpu_devid_irq() by default. Unfortunately,
handle_percpu_devid_irq() isn't NMI safe, and so to run in an NMI
context those should use handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi().
In order to accomplish this, we just have to make room for SGIs in the
array of refcounts that keeps track of which interrupts are set as
NMI. We also rename the array and create a new indexing scheme that
accounts for SGIs.
Also, enable NMI support prior to gic_smp_init() as allocation of SGIs
as IRQs/NMIs happen as part of this routine.
Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
I'll note that this change is a little more black magic to me than
others in this series. I don't have a massive amounts of familiarity
with all the moving parts of gic-v3, so I mostly just followed Mark
Rutland's advice [1].
As per discussion [2], the hope is that this patch could get Acked by
Marc Zyngier and then land through the arm64 tree. If this isn't a
good idea for some reason, I'd love suggestions for alternate ways for
this series to land.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZNC-YRQopO0PaIIo@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZPC1nUw3qKWrC85l@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com
Changes in v13:
- s/_idx/_index/ on the patch to make function names consistent.
Changes in v12:
- Added a comment about why we account for 16 SGIs when Linux uses 8.
Changes in v10:
- Rewrite as needed for 5.11+ as per Mark Rutland and Sumit.
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index eedfa8e9f077..787ccc880b22 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -78,6 +78,13 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
#define GIC_LINE_NR min(GICD_TYPER_SPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer), 1020U)
#define GIC_ESPI_NR GICD_TYPER_ESPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
+/*
+ * There are 16 SGIs, though we only actually use 8 in Linux. The other 8 SGIs
+ * are potentially stolen by the secure side. Some code, especially code dealing
+ * with hwirq IDs, is simplified by accounting for all 16.
+ */
+#define SGI_NR 16
+
/*
* The behaviours of RPR and PMR registers differ depending on the value of
* SCR_EL3.FIQ, and the behaviour of non-secure priority registers of the
@@ -125,8 +132,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gic_nonsecure_priorities);
__priority; \
})
-/* ppi_nmi_refs[n] == number of cpus having ppi[n + 16] set as NMI */
-static refcount_t *ppi_nmi_refs;
+/* rdist_nmi_refs[n] == number of cpus having the rdist interrupt n set as NMI */
+static refcount_t *rdist_nmi_refs;
static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info __initdata;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, has_rss);
@@ -519,9 +526,22 @@ static u32 __gic_get_ppi_index(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
}
}
-static u32 gic_get_ppi_index(struct irq_data *d)
+static u32 __gic_get_rdist_index(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+ switch (__get_intid_range(hwirq)) {
+ case SGI_RANGE:
+ case PPI_RANGE:
+ return hwirq;
+ case EPPI_RANGE:
+ return hwirq - EPPI_BASE_INTID + 32;
+ default:
+ unreachable();
+ }
+}
+
+static u32 gic_get_rdist_index(struct irq_data *d)
{
- return __gic_get_ppi_index(d->hwirq);
+ return __gic_get_rdist_index(d->hwirq);
}
static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d)
@@ -545,11 +565,14 @@ static int gic_irq_nmi_setup(struct irq_data *d)
/* desc lock should already be held */
if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) {
- u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d);
+ u32 idx = gic_get_rdist_index(d);
- /* Setting up PPI as NMI, only switch handler for first NMI */
- if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx])) {
- refcount_set(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx], 1);
+ /*
+ * Setting up a percpu interrupt as NMI, only switch handler
+ * for first NMI
+ */
+ if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx])) {
+ refcount_set(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx], 1);
desc->handle_irq = handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi;
}
} else {
@@ -582,10 +605,10 @@ static void gic_irq_nmi_teardown(struct irq_data *d)
/* desc lock should already be held */
if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d)) {
- u32 idx = gic_get_ppi_index(d);
+ u32 idx = gic_get_rdist_index(d);
/* Tearing down NMI, only switch handler for last NMI */
- if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ppi_nmi_refs[idx]))
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&rdist_nmi_refs[idx]))
desc->handle_irq = handle_percpu_devid_irq;
} else {
desc->handle_irq = handle_fasteoi_irq;
@@ -1279,10 +1302,10 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)
rbase = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
/* Configure SGIs/PPIs as non-secure Group-1 */
- for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + 16; i += 32)
+ for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR; i += 32)
writel_relaxed(~0, rbase + GICR_IGROUPR0 + i / 8);
- gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_data.ppi_nr + 16, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);
+ gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);
/* initialise system registers */
gic_cpu_sys_reg_init();
@@ -1939,12 +1962,13 @@ static void gic_enable_nmi_support(void)
return;
}
- ppi_nmi_refs = kcalloc(gic_data.ppi_nr, sizeof(*ppi_nmi_refs), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ppi_nmi_refs)
+ rdist_nmi_refs = kcalloc(gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR,
+ sizeof(*rdist_nmi_refs), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rdist_nmi_refs)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr; i++)
- refcount_set(&ppi_nmi_refs[i], 0);
+ for (i = 0; i < gic_data.ppi_nr + SGI_NR; i++)
+ refcount_set(&rdist_nmi_refs[i], 0);
pr_info("Pseudo-NMIs enabled using %s ICC_PMR_EL1 synchronisation\n",
gic_has_relaxed_pmr_sync() ? "relaxed" : "forced");
@@ -2061,6 +2085,7 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(phys_addr_t dist_phys_base,
gic_dist_init();
gic_cpu_init();
+ gic_enable_nmi_support();
gic_smp_init();
gic_cpu_pm_init();
@@ -2073,8 +2098,6 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(phys_addr_t dist_phys_base,
gicv2m_init(handle, gic_data.domain);
}
- gic_enable_nmi_support();
-
return 0;
out_free:
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v13 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-06 16:02 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI Douglas Anderson
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2023-09-06 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Douglas Anderson,
Chen-Yu Tsai, gautham.shenoy, linux-kernel, mingo
As per the (somewhat recent) comment before the definition of
`__cpuidle`, the tag is like `noinstr` but also marks a function so it
can be identified by cpu_in_idle(). Let's add these markings to arm64
cpuidle functions
With this change we get useful backtraces like:
NMI backtrace for cpu N skipped: idling at cpu_do_idle+0x94/0x98
instead of useless backtraces when dumping all processors using
nmi_cpu_backtrace().
NOTE: this patch won't make cpu_in_idle() work perfectly for arm64,
but it doesn't hurt and does catch some cases. Specifically an example
that wasn't caught in my testing looked like this:
gic_cpu_sys_reg_init+0x1f8/0x314
gic_cpu_pm_notifier+0x40/0x78
raw_notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0x134
cpu_pm_notify+0x38/0x64
cpu_pm_exit+0x20/0x2c
psci_enter_idle_state+0x48/0x70
cpuidle_enter_state+0xb8/0x260
cpuidle_enter+0x44/0x5c
do_idle+0x188/0x30c
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
(no changes since v11)
Changes in v11:
- Updated commit message as per Stephen.
Changes in v9:
- Added to commit message that this doesn't catch all cases.
Changes in v8:
- "Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle" new for v8
arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
index c1125753fe9b..05cfb347ec26 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idle.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
* ensure that interrupts are not masked at the PMR (because the core will
* not wake up if we block the wake up signal in the interrupt controller).
*/
-void noinstr cpu_do_idle(void)
+void __cpuidle cpu_do_idle(void)
{
struct arm_cpuidle_irq_context context;
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void noinstr cpu_do_idle(void)
/*
* This is our default idle handler.
*/
-void noinstr arch_cpu_idle(void)
+void __cpuidle arch_cpu_idle(void)
{
/*
* This should do all the clock switching and wait for interrupt
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v13 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-06 16:02 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-26 0:39 ` Doug Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI Douglas Anderson
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2023-09-06 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Douglas Anderson, jpoimboe, keescook, linux-kernel, philmd,
samitolvanen, scott, vschneid
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To enable NMI backtrace and KGDB's NMI cpu roundup, we need to free up
at least one dedicated IPI.
On arm64 the IPI_WAKEUP IPI is only used for the ACPI parking protocol,
which itself is only used on some very early ARMv8 systems which
couldn't implement PSCI.
Remove the IPI_WAKEUP IPI, and rely on the IPI_RESCHEDULE IPI to wake
CPUs from the parked state. This will cause a tiny amonut of redundant
work to check the thread flags, but this is miniscule in relation to the
cost of taking and handling the IPI in the first place. We can safely
handle redundant IPI_RESCHEDULE IPIs, so there should be no functional
impact as a result of this change.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
I have no idea how to test this. I just took Mark's patch and jammed
it into my series. Logicially the patch seems reasonable to me.
(no changes since v11)
Changes in v11:
- arch_send_wakeup_ipi() now takes an unsigned int.
Changes in v10:
- ("arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI") new for v10.
arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 28 +++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
index 9b31e6d0da17..efb13112b408 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ extern void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
extern void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
-extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
+extern void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu);
#else
-static inline void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
+static inline void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
{
BUILD_BUG();
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
index b1990e38aed0..e1be29e608b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
&mailbox->entry_point);
writel_relaxed(cpu_entry->gic_cpu_id, &mailbox->cpu_id);
- arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
+ arch_send_wakeup_ipi(cpu);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 960b98b43506..a5848f1ef817 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
IPI_TIMER,
IPI_IRQ_WORK,
- IPI_WAKEUP,
NR_IPI
};
@@ -764,7 +763,6 @@ static const char *ipi_types[NR_IPI] __tracepoint_string = {
[IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP] = "CPU stop (for crash dump) interrupts",
[IPI_TIMER] = "Timer broadcast interrupts",
[IPI_IRQ_WORK] = "IRQ work interrupts",
- [IPI_WAKEUP] = "CPU wake-up interrupts",
};
static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr);
@@ -797,13 +795,6 @@ void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_CALL_FUNC);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
-void arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
-{
- smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_WAKEUP);
-}
-#endif
-
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_WORK
void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
{
@@ -897,14 +888,6 @@ static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
break;
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
- case IPI_WAKEUP:
- WARN_ONCE(!acpi_parking_protocol_valid(cpu),
- "CPU%u: Wake-up IPI outside the ACPI parking protocol\n",
- cpu);
- break;
-#endif
-
default:
pr_crit("CPU%u: Unknown IPI message 0x%x\n", cpu, ipinr);
break;
@@ -979,6 +962,17 @@ void arch_smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)
smp_cross_call(cpumask_of(cpu), IPI_RESCHEDULE);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
+void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ /*
+ * We use a scheduler IPI to wake the CPU as this avoids the need for a
+ * dedicated IPI and we can safely handle spurious scheduler IPIs.
+ */
+ arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+}
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
void tick_broadcast(const struct cpumask *mask)
{
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-06 16:02 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI Douglas Anderson
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2023-09-06 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Douglas Anderson,
Chen-Yu Tsai, jpoimboe, linux-kernel, scott, vschneid
Enable arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace() support on arm64. This enables
things much like they are enabled on arm32 (including some of the
funky logic around NR_IPI, nr_ipi, and MAX_IPI) but with the
difference that, unlike arm32, we'll try to enable the backtrace to
use pseudo-NMI.
NOTE: this patch is a squash of the little bit of code adding the
ability to mark an IPI to try to use pseudo-NMI plus the little bit of
code to hook things up for kgdb. This approach was decided upon in the
discussion of v9 [1].
This patch depends on commit 8d539b84f1e3 ("nmi_backtrace: allow
excluding an arbitrary CPU") since that commit changed the prototype
of arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(), which this patch implements.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZORY51mF4alI41G1@FVFF77S0Q05N
Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Co-developed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
(no changes since v12)
Changes in v12:
- Minor comment change to add "()" after nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace.
- Updated the commit hash of the commit this depends on.
Changes in v11:
- Adjust comment about NR_IPI/MAX_IPI.
- Don't use confusing "backed by" idiom in comment.
- Made arm64_backtrace_ipi() static.
Changes in v10:
- Backtrace now directly supported in smp.c
- Squash backtrace into patch adding support for pseudo-NMI IPIs.
Changes in v9:
- Added comments that we might not be using NMI always.
- Fold in v8 patch #10 ("Fallback to a regular IPI if NMI isn't enabled")
- Moved header file out of "include" since it didn't need to be there.
- Remove arm64_supports_nmi()
- Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by NMI.
- arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace() no longer returns bool
Changes in v8:
- Removed "#ifdef CONFIG_SMP" since arm64 is always SMP
- debug_ipi_setup() and debug_ipi_teardown() no longer take cpu param
arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h | 3 ++
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
index fac08e18bcd5..50ce8b697ff3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
#include <asm-generic/irq.h>
+void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu);
+#define arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
+
struct pt_regs;
int set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *));
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index a5848f1ef817..28c904ca499a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
#include <linux/kexec.h>
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include <linux/nmi.h>
#include <asm/alternative.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
@@ -72,12 +73,18 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP,
IPI_TIMER,
IPI_IRQ_WORK,
- NR_IPI
+ NR_IPI,
+ /*
+ * Any enum >= NR_IPI and < MAX_IPI is special and not tracable
+ * with trace_ipi_*
+ */
+ IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
+ MAX_IPI
};
static int ipi_irq_base __read_mostly;
static int nr_ipi __read_mostly = NR_IPI;
-static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[NR_IPI] __read_mostly;
+static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __read_mostly;
static void ipi_setup(int cpu);
@@ -845,6 +852,22 @@ static void __noreturn ipi_cpu_crash_stop(unsigned int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs
#endif
}
+static void arm64_backtrace_ipi(cpumask_t *mask)
+{
+ __ipi_send_mask(ipi_desc[IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE], mask);
+}
+
+void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu)
+{
+ /*
+ * NOTE: though nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace() has "nmi_" in the name,
+ * nothing about it truly needs to be implemented using an NMI, it's
+ * just that it's _allowed_ to work with NMIs. If ipi_should_be_nmi()
+ * returned false our backtrace attempt will just use a regular IPI.
+ */
+ nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(mask, exclude_cpu, arm64_backtrace_ipi);
+}
+
/*
* Main handler for inter-processor interrupts
*/
@@ -888,6 +911,14 @@ static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
break;
#endif
+ case IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE:
+ /*
+ * NOTE: in some cases this _won't_ be NMI context. See the
+ * comment in arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace().
+ */
+ nmi_cpu_backtrace(get_irq_regs());
+ break;
+
default:
pr_crit("CPU%u: Unknown IPI message 0x%x\n", cpu, ipinr);
break;
@@ -909,6 +940,19 @@ static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr)
__ipi_send_mask(ipi_desc[ipinr], target);
}
+static bool ipi_should_be_nmi(enum ipi_msg_type ipi)
+{
+ if (!system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
+ return false;
+
+ switch (ipi) {
+ case IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
static void ipi_setup(int cpu)
{
int i;
@@ -916,8 +960,14 @@ static void ipi_setup(int cpu)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ipi_irq_base))
return;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++)
- enable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) {
+ if (ipi_should_be_nmi(i)) {
+ prepare_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
+ enable_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
+ } else {
+ enable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
+ }
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
@@ -928,8 +978,14 @@ static void ipi_teardown(int cpu)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ipi_irq_base))
return;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++)
- disable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) {
+ if (ipi_should_be_nmi(i)) {
+ disable_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
+ teardown_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
+ } else {
+ disable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i);
+ }
+ }
}
#endif
@@ -937,15 +993,23 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)
{
int i;
- WARN_ON(n < NR_IPI);
- nr_ipi = min(n, NR_IPI);
+ WARN_ON(n < MAX_IPI);
+ nr_ipi = min(n, MAX_IPI);
for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) {
int err;
- err = request_percpu_irq(ipi_base + i, ipi_handler,
- "IPI", &cpu_number);
- WARN_ON(err);
+ if (ipi_should_be_nmi(i)) {
+ err = request_percpu_nmi(ipi_base + i, ipi_handler,
+ "IPI", &cpu_number);
+ WARN(err, "Could not request IPI %d as NMI, err=%d\n",
+ i, err);
+ } else {
+ err = request_percpu_irq(ipi_base + i, ipi_handler,
+ "IPI", &cpu_number);
+ WARN(err, "Could not request IPI %d as IRQ, err=%d\n",
+ i, err);
+ }
ipi_desc[i] = irq_to_desc(ipi_base + i);
irq_set_status_flags(ipi_base + i, IRQ_HIDDEN);
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v13 5/7] arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-06 16:03 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI roundup Douglas Anderson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2023-09-06 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Douglas Anderson,
Chen-Yu Tsai, jpoimboe, linux-kernel, scott, vschneid
There's no reason why IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP can't be
handled as NMI. They are very simple and everything in them is
NMI-safe. Mark them as things to use NMI for if NMI is available.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
This patch is tested by Mark Rutland's LKDTM test [1].
[1] http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230831101026.3122590-1-mark.rutland@arm.com
(no changes since v10)
Changes in v10:
- ("IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI") new for v10.
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 28c904ca499a..800c59cf9b64 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -946,6 +946,8 @@ static bool ipi_should_be_nmi(enum ipi_msg_type ipi)
return false;
switch (ipi) {
+ case IPI_CPU_STOP:
+ case IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP:
case IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE:
return true;
default:
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v13 6/7] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI roundup
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-06 16:03 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init Douglas Anderson
2023-09-25 17:10 ` [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Catalin Marinas
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2023-09-06 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Douglas Anderson,
Chen-Yu Tsai, jpoimboe, linux-kernel, scott, vschneid
Up until now we've been using the generic (weak) implementation for
kgdb_roundup_cpus() when using kgdb on arm64. Let's move to a custom
one. The advantage here is that, when pseudo-NMI is enabled on a
device, we'll be able to round up CPUs using pseudo-NMI. This allows
us to debug CPUs that are stuck with interrupts disabled. If
pseudo-NMIs are not enabled then we'll fallback to just using an IPI,
which is still slightly better than the generic implementation since
it avoids the potential situation described in the generic
kgdb_call_nmi_hook().
Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
(no changes since v10)
Changes in v10:
- Don't allocate the cpumask on the stack; just iterate.
- Moved kgdb calls to smp.c to avoid needing to export IPI info.
- kgdb now has its own IPI.
Changes in v9:
- Remove fallback for when debug IPI isn't available.
- Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by NMI.
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 800c59cf9b64..1a53e57c81d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/irq_work.h>
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
#include <linux/kexec.h>
+#include <linux/kgdb.h>
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <linux/nmi.h>
@@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
* with trace_ipi_*
*/
IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE = NR_IPI,
+ IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP,
MAX_IPI
};
@@ -868,6 +870,22 @@ void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu)
nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(mask, exclude_cpu, arm64_backtrace_ipi);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB
+void kgdb_roundup_cpus(void)
+{
+ int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ /* No need to roundup ourselves */
+ if (cpu == this_cpu)
+ continue;
+
+ __ipi_send_single(ipi_desc[IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP], cpu);
+ }
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* Main handler for inter-processor interrupts
*/
@@ -919,6 +937,10 @@ static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
nmi_cpu_backtrace(get_irq_regs());
break;
+ case IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP:
+ kgdb_nmicallback(cpu, get_irq_regs());
+ break;
+
default:
pr_crit("CPU%u: Unknown IPI message 0x%x\n", cpu, ipinr);
break;
@@ -949,6 +971,7 @@ static bool ipi_should_be_nmi(enum ipi_msg_type ipi)
case IPI_CPU_STOP:
case IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP:
case IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE:
+ case IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP:
return true;
default:
return false;
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v13 7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI roundup Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-06 16:03 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 21:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-09-25 17:10 ` [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Catalin Marinas
7 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2023-09-06 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Douglas Anderson,
Chen-Yu Tsai, jpoimboe, linux-kernel, scott, vschneid
Mark the three IPI-related globals in smp.c as "__ro_after_init" since
they are only ever set in set_smp_ipi_range(), which is marked
"__init". This is a better and more secure marking than the old
"__read_mostly".
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
This patch is almost completely unrelated to the rest of the series
other than the fact that it would cause a merge conflict with the
series if sent separately. I tacked it on to this series in response
to Stephen's feedback on v11 of this series [1]. If someone hates it
(not sure why they would), it could be dropped. If someone loves it,
it could be promoted to the start of the series and/or land on its own
(resolving merge conflicts).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAE-0n52iVDgZa8XT8KTMj12c_ESSJt7f7A0fuZ_oAMMqpGcSzA@mail.gmail.com
(no changes since v12)
Changes in v12:
- ("arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init") new for v12.
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 1a53e57c81d0..814d9aa93b21 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
MAX_IPI
};
-static int ipi_irq_base __read_mostly;
-static int nr_ipi __read_mostly = NR_IPI;
-static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __read_mostly;
+static int ipi_irq_base __ro_after_init;
+static int nr_ipi __ro_after_init = NR_IPI;
+static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __ro_after_init;
static void ipi_setup(int cpu);
--
2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v13 7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-06 21:45 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2023-09-06 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas, Daniel Thompson, Douglas Anderson, Marc Zyngier,
Mark Rutland, Sumit Garg, Will Deacon
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Chen-Yu Tsai,
jpoimboe, linux-kernel, scott, vschneid
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2023-09-06 09:03:02)
> Mark the three IPI-related globals in smp.c as "__ro_after_init" since
> they are only ever set in set_smp_ipi_range(), which is marked
> "__init". This is a better and more secure marking than the old
> "__read_mostly".
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-12 12:43 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-09-12 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Douglas Anderson
Cc: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki,
Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai, Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra,
Masayoshi Mizuma, Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel,
kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd, linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner,
ito-yuichi, Chen-Yu Tsai, linux-kernel
On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 17:02:56 +0100,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> As of commit 6abbd6988971 ("irqchip/gic, gic-v3: Make SGIs use
> handle_percpu_devid_irq()") SGIs are treated the same as PPIs/EPPIs
> and use handle_percpu_devid_irq() by default. Unfortunately,
> handle_percpu_devid_irq() isn't NMI safe, and so to run in an NMI
> context those should use handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi().
>
> In order to accomplish this, we just have to make room for SGIs in the
> array of refcounts that keeps track of which interrupts are set as
> NMI. We also rename the array and create a new indexing scheme that
> accounts for SGIs.
>
> Also, enable NMI support prior to gic_smp_init() as allocation of SGIs
> as IRQs/NMIs happen as part of this routine.
>
> Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-25 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2023-09-25 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg, Daniel Thompson,
Marc Zyngier, Douglas Anderson
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, gautham.shenoy,
jpoimboe, keescook, linux-kernel, mingo, philmd, samitolvanen,
scott, vschneid
On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 09:02:55 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> This is an attempt to resurrect Sumit's old patch series [1] that
> allowed us to use the arm64 pseudo-NMI to get backtraces of CPUs and
> also to round up CPUs in kdb/kgdb. The last post from Sumit that I
> could find was v7, so I started my series at v8. I haven't copied all
> of his old changelongs here, but you can find them from the link.
>
> This patch series targets v6.6. Specifically it can't land in v6.5
> since it depends on commit 8d539b84f1e3 ("nmi_backtrace: allow
> excluding an arbitrary CPU").
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/backtrace-ipi), thanks!
[1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a02026bf9da1
[2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d0c14a7d36f0
[3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/2b2d0a7a96ab
[4/7] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/331a1b3a836c
[5/7] arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/d7402513c935
[6/7] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI roundup
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/2f5cd0c7ffde
[7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/62817d5ba25d
--
Catalin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v13 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI Douglas Anderson
@ 2023-09-26 0:39 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-02 16:48 ` Doug Anderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Doug Anderson @ 2023-09-26 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Chen-Yu Tsai,
jpoimboe, keescook, linux-kernel, philmd, samitolvanen, scott,
vschneid
Mark,
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:06 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
> +void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + /*
> + * We use a scheduler IPI to wake the CPU as this avoids the need for a
> + * dedicated IPI and we can safely handle spurious scheduler IPIs.
> + */
> + arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
I was backporting this to our ChromeOS kernels and our build test bot
noticed that arch_smp_send_reschedule() didn't exist in older kernels.
That's fine--I can always adjust this patch when backporting or
cherry-pick extra patches, but it made me wonder. Is there a reason
you chose to use arch_smp_send_reschedule() directly here instead of
smp_send_reschedule()? I guess the only difference is that you're
bypassing the tracing. Is that on purpose? Should we add a comment
about it, or change this to smp_send_reschedule()?
Thanks!
-Doug
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v13 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI
2023-09-26 0:39 ` Doug Anderson
@ 2023-10-02 16:48 ` Doug Anderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Doug Anderson @ 2023-10-02 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Sumit Garg,
Daniel Thompson, Marc Zyngier
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Rafael J . Wysocki, Lecopzer Chen, Chen-Yu Tsai,
Tomohiro Misono, Peter Zijlstra, Masayoshi Mizuma,
Stephane Eranian, Ard Biesheuvel, kgdb-bugreport, Stephen Boyd,
linux-perf-users, Thomas Gleixner, ito-yuichi, Chen-Yu Tsai,
jpoimboe, keescook, linux-kernel, philmd, samitolvanen, scott,
vschneid
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:39 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:06 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
> > +void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * We use a scheduler IPI to wake the CPU as this avoids the need for a
> > + * dedicated IPI and we can safely handle spurious scheduler IPIs.
> > + */
> > + arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
>
> I was backporting this to our ChromeOS kernels and our build test bot
> noticed that arch_smp_send_reschedule() didn't exist in older kernels.
> That's fine--I can always adjust this patch when backporting or
> cherry-pick extra patches, but it made me wonder. Is there a reason
> you chose to use arch_smp_send_reschedule() directly here instead of
> smp_send_reschedule()? I guess the only difference is that you're
> bypassing the tracing. Is that on purpose? Should we add a comment
> about it, or change this to smp_send_reschedule()?
FWIW, I posted a patch changing this to smp_send_reschedule(). Please
yell if this is incorrect.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002094526.2.I2e6d22fc42ccbf6b26465a28a10e36e05ccf3075@changeid
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-02 16:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-06 16:02 [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-09-12 12:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 3/7] arm64: smp: Remove dedicated wakeup IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-09-26 0:39 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-02 16:48 ` Doug Anderson
2023-09-06 16:02 ` [PATCH v13 4/7] arm64: smp: Add arch support for backtrace using pseudo-NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 5/7] arm64: smp: IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP should try for NMI Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 6/7] arm64: kgdb: Implement kgdb_roundup_cpus() to enable pseudo-NMI roundup Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 16:03 ` [PATCH v13 7/7] arm64: smp: Mark IPI globals as __ro_after_init Douglas Anderson
2023-09-06 21:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-09-25 17:10 ` [PATCH v13 0/7] arm64: Add IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for some IPIs Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).