public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: puranjay12@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] arm32, bpf: add support for 32-bit signed division
Date: Wed,  6 Sep 2023 18:33:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230906183320.1959008-6-puranjay12@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230906183320.1959008-1-puranjay12@gmail.com>

The cpuv4 added a new BPF_SDIV instruction that does signed division.
The encoding is similar to BPF_DIV but BPF_SDIV sets offset=1.

ARM32 already supports 32-bit BPF_DIV which can be easily extended to
support BPF_SDIV as ARM32 has the SDIV instruction. When the CPU is not
ARM-v7, we implement that SDIV/SMOD with the function call similar to
the implementation of DIV/MOD.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index f837db5c71b1..91b3294963bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -228,6 +228,16 @@ static u32 jit_mod32(u32 dividend, u32 divisor)
 	return dividend % divisor;
 }
 
+static s32 jit_sdiv32(s32 dividend, s32 divisor)
+{
+	return dividend / divisor;
+}
+
+static s32 jit_smod32(s32 dividend, s32 divisor)
+{
+	return dividend % divisor;
+}
+
 static inline void _emit(int cond, u32 inst, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 {
 	inst |= (cond << 28);
@@ -477,17 +487,18 @@ static inline int epilogue_offset(const struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 	return to - from - 2;
 }
 
-static inline void emit_udivmod(u8 rd, u8 rm, u8 rn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, u8 op)
+static inline void emit_udivmod(u8 rd, u8 rm, u8 rn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, u8 op, u8 sign)
 {
 	const int exclude_mask = BIT(ARM_R0) | BIT(ARM_R1);
 	const s8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
+	u32 dst;
 
 #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ == 7
 	if (elf_hwcap & HWCAP_IDIVA) {
-		if (op == BPF_DIV)
-			emit(ARM_UDIV(rd, rm, rn), ctx);
-		else {
-			emit(ARM_UDIV(ARM_IP, rm, rn), ctx);
+		if (op == BPF_DIV) {
+			emit(sign ? ARM_SDIV(rd, rm, rn) : ARM_UDIV(rd, rm, rn), ctx);
+		} else {
+			emit(sign ? ARM_SDIV(ARM_IP, rm, rn) : ARM_UDIV(ARM_IP, rm, rn), ctx);
 			emit(ARM_MLS(rd, rn, ARM_IP, rm), ctx);
 		}
 		return;
@@ -515,8 +526,19 @@ static inline void emit_udivmod(u8 rd, u8 rm, u8 rn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, u8 op)
 	emit(ARM_PUSH(CALLER_MASK & ~exclude_mask), ctx);
 
 	/* Call appropriate function */
-	emit_mov_i(ARM_IP, op == BPF_DIV ?
-		   (u32)jit_udiv32 : (u32)jit_mod32, ctx);
+	if (sign) {
+		if (op == BPF_DIV)
+			dst = (u32)jit_sdiv32;
+		else
+			dst = (u32)jit_smod32;
+	} else {
+		if (op == BPF_DIV)
+			dst = (u32)jit_udiv32;
+		else
+			dst = (u32)jit_mod32;
+	}
+
+	emit_mov_i(ARM_IP, dst, ctx);
 	emit_blx_r(ARM_IP, ctx);
 
 	/* Restore caller-saved registers from stack */
@@ -1547,7 +1569,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 			rt = src_lo;
 			break;
 		}
-		emit_udivmod(rd_lo, rd_lo, rt, ctx, BPF_OP(code));
+		emit_udivmod(rd_lo, rd_lo, rt, ctx, BPF_OP(code), off);
 		arm_bpf_put_reg32(dst_lo, rd_lo, ctx);
 		if (!ctx->prog->aux->verifier_zext)
 			emit_a32_mov_i(dst_hi, 0, ctx);
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.h b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.h
index 79c7373fadce..438f0e1f91a0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.h
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.h
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@
 #define ARM_INST_TST_I		0x03100000
 
 #define ARM_INST_UDIV		0x0730f010
+#define ARM_INST_SDIV		0x0710f010
 
 #define ARM_INST_UMULL		0x00800090
 
@@ -267,6 +268,7 @@
 #define ARM_TST_I(rn, imm)	_AL3_I(ARM_INST_TST, 0, rn, imm)
 
 #define ARM_UDIV(rd, rn, rm)	(ARM_INST_UDIV | (rd) << 16 | (rn) | (rm) << 8)
+#define ARM_SDIV(rd, rn, rm)	(ARM_INST_SDIV | (rd) << 16 | (rn) | (rm) << 8)
 
 #define ARM_UMULL(rd_lo, rd_hi, rn, rm)	(ARM_INST_UMULL | (rd_hi) << 16 \
 					 | (rd_lo) << 12 | (rm) << 8 | rn)
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-06 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-06 18:33 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] arm32, bpf: add support for cpuv4 insns Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-06 18:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] arm32, bpf: add support for 32-bit offset jmp instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-07  8:39   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06 18:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] arm32, bpf: add support for sign-extension load instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-07  8:44   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06 18:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] arm32, bpf: add support for sign-extension mov instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-07  8:45   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06 18:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] arm32, bpf: add support for unconditional bswap instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-07  8:48   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-07  9:08     ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-07  9:15       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06 18:33 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2023-09-07  8:49   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] arm32, bpf: add support for 32-bit signed division Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06 18:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] arm32, bpf: add support for 64 bit division instruction Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-07  8:50   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-09-06 18:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] selftest, bpf: enable cpu v4 tests for arm32 Puranjay Mohan
2023-09-06 18:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions Puranjay Mohan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230906183320.1959008-6-puranjay12@gmail.com \
    --to=puranjay12@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=illusionist.neo@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox