From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B16EE8006 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 14:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243736AbjIHOMY (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 10:12:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46814 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232491AbjIHOMW (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 10:12:22 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EA71BEA; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 07:12:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1694182336; x=1725718336; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=qHRQJaYAD2oPzbtau/I7LzLm8A7noCwIpXT890WHdIk=; b=HmEBWVrNiwW4M4YGOV89GpYHhOclcRTWIbUgVw/9C5kdBXLzsqLK/hdX BktrQ3QkuLJwBpF9GIZXjZFDq0qu4Ko/fRkWxB0MhAm+ORZPvQdlJ/5DI NLrKeIhV471A6qb5OFcOLdQxrX9MBhpLe0Lontt30nWwLfJi3Zk22KGNH ueIwPeH+m2ma/jTWobd8bXMfEQ5Ppk04of+mj+RqplBAgjaBnI/YA4gTX lG8cirfaCiTRFQnFxslOotwQWVnYi6JSJF126fQuS40J1xhwOlQ6GGL8M uEi68n1AidHzaWIJ5AMAWkiwtxKB/P9bpZ4xXkfV5wqtiW8GLcmxuVAwG g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10827"; a="357955761" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,237,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="357955761" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Sep 2023 07:12:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10827"; a="735965660" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,237,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="735965660" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 59b3c6e06877) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2023 07:12:09 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 59b3c6e06877 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qecDP-0002KR-0L; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 14:12:07 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 22:11:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Lu Hongfei , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Bart Van Assche , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Can Guo , Bean Huo , Arthur Simchaev , Stanley Chu , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Asutosh Das , "Bao D. Nguyen" , zhanghui , Po-Wen Kao , Eric Biggers , Keoseong Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, opensource.kernel@vivo.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add ufshcd_wb_buf_resize function to enable WB buffer resize Message-ID: <202309082109.DPcrgu3e-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230908102113.547-3-luhongfei@vivo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230908102113.547-3-luhongfei@vivo.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Lu, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on mkp-scsi/for-next] [also build test WARNING on jejb-scsi/for-next linus/master v6.5 next-20230908] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lu-Hongfei/scsi-ufs-core-add-wb-buffer-resize-related-attr_idn/20230908-182656 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908102113.547-3-luhongfei%40vivo.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add ufshcd_wb_buf_resize function to enable WB buffer resize config: s390-randconfig-001-20230908 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230908/202309082109.DPcrgu3e-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230908/202309082109.DPcrgu3e-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309082109.DPcrgu3e-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:25: In file included from include/linux/iopoll.h:14: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:25: In file included from include/linux/iopoll.h:14: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:25: In file included from include/linux/iopoll.h:14: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:6055:6: warning: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized] 6055 | if (ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, 1 * USEC_PER_SEC)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:6067:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here 6067 | return ret; | ^~~ drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:6055:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false 6055 | if (ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, 1 * USEC_PER_SEC)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 6056 | goto out; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:6051:9: note: initialize the variable 'ret' to silence this warning 6051 | int ret; | ^ | = 0 13 warnings generated. vim +6055 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c 6048 6049 int ufshcd_wb_buf_resize(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 resize_op) 6050 { 6051 int ret; 6052 u8 index; 6053 6054 ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba); > 6055 if (ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, 1 * USEC_PER_SEC)) 6056 goto out; 6057 6058 index = ufshcd_wb_get_query_index(hba); 6059 ret = ufshcd_query_attr_retry(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_WRITE_ATTR, 6060 QUERY_ATTR_IDN_WB_BUF_RESIZE_EN, index, 0, &resize_op); 6061 if (ret) 6062 dev_err(hba->dev, 6063 "%s: Enable WB buf resize operation failed %d\n", 6064 __func__, ret); 6065 out: 6066 ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba); 6067 return ret; 6068 } 6069 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki