public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
To: jk@ozlabs.org, joel@jms.id.au, alistair@popple.id.au,
	eajames@linux.ibm.com, linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] fsi: sbefifo: Validate pending user write
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:38:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230911223809.3505431-3-ninad@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230911223809.3505431-1-ninad@linux.ibm.com>

This commit rejects user write operation if previous write operation is
still pending.

As per the current kernel driver design, write operation prepares a
buffer for FSI write, the actual FSI write is performed on next read
operation. There is a possibility of memory leak if buggy application
sends two back to back writes or two parallel writes.

Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
index a95b32461f8f..fc41cdd6e890 100644
--- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
+++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
@@ -877,6 +877,12 @@ static ssize_t sbefifo_user_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 
 	mutex_lock(&user->file_lock);
 
+	/* Previous write is still in progress */
+	if (user->pending_cmd) {
+		mutex_unlock(&user->file_lock);
+		return -EALREADY;
+	}
+
 	/* Can we use the pre-allocate buffer ? If not, allocate */
 	if (len <= PAGE_SIZE)
 		user->pending_cmd = user->cmd_page;
-- 
2.39.2


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-11 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-11 22:38 [PATCH v2 0/2] fsi: sbefifo: fixes Ninad Palsule
2023-09-11 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fsi: sbefifo: Bump up user write cmd length Ninad Palsule
2023-09-11 22:38 ` Ninad Palsule [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230911223809.3505431-3-ninad@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ninad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
    --cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox