Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] Unify TDCALL/SEAMCALL and TDVMCALL assembly

[Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 03:37:49PM +0200,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 9/12/23 02:57, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > > > +#include <asm/tdx.h>
> > > > 
> > > > #include <asm-generic/asm-prototypes.h>
> > > > 
> > > Thanks Paolo!
> > > 
> > > I never met this issue, not even from LKP.  Do you happen to know
> > > which Kconfig option can trigger this?  Or would you mind sharing
> > > your .config?
> > (replying via outlook due to some networking issue of my home
> > network)
> > 
> > After digging, this is due to exporting __seamcall*() assembly
> > functions while MODVERSIONS is enabled.
> > 
> > This series itself doesn't cause this warning.
> > 
> > I didn't export them in this series because I would like to leave to
> > KVM patches when we are sure we need to export them.
> > 
> > E.g., I have seamcall*() wrappers to retry running out of entropy,
> > and we may have concern exporting __seamcall*() low level functions
> > directly and may wish to export higher level wrappers.
> > 
> > So I think the fix should be with the patch that truly exports those
> > __seamcall*().  I'll talk to Isaku on this to get his idea.
> 
> Ah indeed it's not caused by your patches, but rather by the Isaku's KVM TDX
> support ("KVM: TDX: Add C wrapper functions for SEAMCALLs to the TDX
> module").  The fix is just to squash the #include into his patch.

Yes, I'll squash the fix into the patch.
-- 
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com>