* [PATCH v1] mm: make __GFP_BITS_SHIFT independent of CONFIG_LOCKDEP
@ 2023-09-18 15:32 Alexander Potapenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Alexander Potapenko @ 2023-09-18 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glider, dvyukov, elver, akpm, mingo, linux-mm; +Cc: linux-kernel, kasan-dev
The list of GFP flags is sparse already (see 0x200u and flags defined
based on CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS), so it makes little sense to save one
bit at the end of it if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is undefined.
The dependence of __GFP_BITS_SHIFT on CONFIG_LOCKDEP also does not let us
add new flags after ___GFP_NOLOCKDEP.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
---
An alternative to this patch would be putting all ___GFP_ flags into
enum, so that we they occupy as few bits as possible.
My understanding is that this is doable, because tools/perf/builtin-kmem.c
does not depend on the flag values, but maybe I am missing something?
---
include/linux/gfp_types.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp_types.h b/include/linux/gfp_types.h
index 6583a58670c57..bb8d3b31e3b6d 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp_types.h
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ typedef unsigned int __bitwise gfp_t;
#define __GFP_NOLOCKDEP ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_NOLOCKDEP)
/* Room for N __GFP_FOO bits */
-#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT (26 + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
+#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT (27)
#define __GFP_BITS_MASK ((__force gfp_t)((1 << __GFP_BITS_SHIFT) - 1))
/**
--
2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-09-18 15:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-18 15:32 [PATCH v1] mm: make __GFP_BITS_SHIFT independent of CONFIG_LOCKDEP Alexander Potapenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox