From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 05/11] KVM: arm64: PMU: Add a helper to read a vCPU's PMCR_EL0
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 23:40:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230926234008.2348607-6-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230926234008.2348607-1-rananta@google.com>
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Add a helper to read a vCPU's PMCR_EL0, and use it when KVM
reads a vCPU's PMCR_EL0.
The PMCR_EL0 value is tracked by a sysreg file per each vCPU.
The following patches will make (only) PMCR_EL0.N track per guest.
Having the new helper will be useful to combine the PMCR_EL0.N
field (tracked per guest) and the other fields (tracked per vCPU)
to provide the value of PMCR_EL0.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 3 +--
arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 6 +++---
include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 6 ++++++
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 4866b3f7b4ea3..86cafe5a6010b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -801,8 +801,7 @@ static int check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_RELOAD_PMU, vcpu))
- kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu,
- __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0));
+ kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu));
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_RESYNC_PMU_EL0, vcpu))
kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index 998e1bbd5310d..d89438956f7d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static bool kvm_pmc_is_64bit(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
static bool kvm_pmc_has_64bit_overflow(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
- u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc), PMCR_EL0);
+ u64 val = kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc));
return (pmc->idx < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP)) ||
(pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX && (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC));
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- u64 val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
+ u64 val = kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
val &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
if (val == 0)
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
if (!kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))
return;
- if (!(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) || !val)
+ if (!(kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) || !val)
return;
for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static u64 kvm_pmu_overflow_status(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
u64 reg = 0;
- if ((__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E)) {
+ if ((kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E)) {
reg = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0);
reg &= __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
reg &= __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1);
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static void kvm_pmu_counter_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{
int i;
- if (!(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E))
+ if (!(kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E))
return;
/* Weed out disabled counters */
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
static bool kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
- return (__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) &&
+ return (kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) &&
(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCNTENSET_EL0) & BIT(pmc->idx));
}
@@ -1084,3 +1084,12 @@ u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void)
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_V3P5);
return FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), tmp);
}
+
+/**
+ * kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr - Read PMCR_EL0 register for the vCPU
+ * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
+ */
+u64 kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
+}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 66b9e1de54230..5ae7399f2b822 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
* Only update writeable bits of PMCR (continuing into
* kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr() as well)
*/
- val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
+ val = kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu);
val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK;
val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK;
if (!kvm_supports_32bit_el0())
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, val);
} else {
/* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */
- val = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0)
+ val = kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu)
& ~(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_C);
p->regval = val;
}
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static bool pmu_counter_idx_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 idx)
{
u64 pmcr, val;
- pmcr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
+ pmcr = kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu);
val = (pmcr >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
if (idx >= val && idx != ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX) {
kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index b80c75d80886b..c6a5e49b850ab 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_resync_el0(void);
u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void);
int kvm_arm_set_default_pmu(struct kvm *kvm);
+u64 kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
#else
struct kvm_pmu {
};
@@ -180,6 +181,11 @@ static inline int kvm_arm_set_default_pmu(struct kvm *kvm)
return -ENODEV;
}
+static inline u64 kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif
#endif
--
2.42.0.582.g8ccd20d70d-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 23:39 [PATCH v6 00/11] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit the number of PMCs on vCPU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:39 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] KVM: arm64: PMU: Introduce helpers to set the guest's PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:39 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set the default PMU for the guest on vCPU reset Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-27 8:02 ` Oliver Upton
2023-09-27 17:36 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:40 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] KVM: arm64: PMU: Clear PM{C,I}NTEN{SET,CLR} and PMOVS{SET,CLR} " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:40 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] KVM: arm64: PMU: Don't define the sysreg reset() for PM{USERENR,CCFILTR}_EL0 Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:40 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2023-09-26 23:40 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set PMCR_EL0.N for vCPU based on the associated PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:40 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit PMCR_EL0.N for the guest Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-28 23:08 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-26 23:40 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] tools: Import arm_pmuv3.h Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:40 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:40 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for implemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-09-26 23:40 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230926234008.2348607-6-rananta@google.com \
--to=rananta@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox