From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Martin Kurbanov <mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Mario Kicherer <dev@kicherer.org>,
Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<kernel@sberdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: spinand: add support for FORESEE F35SQA002G
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 14:09:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231002140953.170c0055@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54227489-519b-3268-885f-cf7a9687822b@salutedevices.com>
Hi Martin,
mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com wrote on Mon, 2 Oct 2023 13:18:18 +0300:
> Hi Miquel,
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On 02.10.2023 12:44, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >> +static int f35sqa002g_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> >> + struct mtd_oob_region *region)
> >> +{
> >> + /* XXX: It is not possible to partially write to this OOB area, as both
> >> + * the main and OOB areas are protected by ECC. The user needs to
> >> + * program both the main area and OOB area at one programming time,
> >> + * so that the ECC parity code can be calculated properly.
> >> + */
> >
> > Is this comment really needed? I believe it could be dropped, unless
> > you are really experiencing strange subpage write attempts?
>
> If you write separately to the main area and the OOB area. This is the
> case with many SPI NAND chips, I agree that this comment can be dropped.
>
All NAND chips have this limitation actually. I guess you can just get
rid of the comment. The rest looks ok.
Thanks, Miquèl
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-02 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-29 14:49 [PATCH v1] mtd: spinand: add support for FORESEE F35SQA002G Martin Kurbanov
2023-10-02 9:44 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-02 10:18 ` Martin Kurbanov
2023-10-02 12:09 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231002140953.170c0055@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=dev@kicherer.org \
--cc=gch981213@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mmkurbanov@salutedevices.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox