From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Michael Walle" <michael@walle.cc>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"Robert Marko" <robert.marko@sartura.hr>,
"Luka Perkov" <luka.perkov@sartura.hr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wenst@chromium.org>,
"Daniel Golle" <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become platform devices
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 11:43:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231003114326.7c61b07c@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84ff0dd8-706e-4b44-5313-3dd77b83100c@linaro.org>
Hi Srinivas,
> > +static int nvmem_dev_match_available_layout(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct nvmem_device *nvmem = to_nvmem_device(dev);
> > +
> > + return nvmem_match_available_layout(nvmem);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int nvmem_for_each_dev(int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data))
> > +{
> > + return bus_for_each_dev(&nvmem_bus_type, NULL, NULL, fn);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * When an NVMEM device is registered, try to match against a layout and
> > + * populate the cells. When an NVMEM layout is probed, ensure all NVMEM devices
> > + * which could use it properly expose their cells.
> > + */
> > +static int nvmem_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> > + unsigned long event_flags, void *context)
> > +{
> > + struct nvmem_device *nvmem = NULL;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + switch (event_flags) {
> > + case NVMEM_ADD:
> > + nvmem = context;
> > + break;
> > + case NVMEM_LAYOUT_ADD:
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > + }
>
> It looks bit unnatural for core to register notifier for its own events.
>
>
> Why do we need the notifier at core level, can we not just handle this in core before raising these events, instead of registering a notifier cb?
There is no good place to do that "synchronously". We need some kind of
notification mechanism in these two cases:
* A memory device is being probed -> if a matching layout driver is
already available, we need to parse the device and expose the cells,
but not in the thread registering the memory device.
* A layout driver is being insmod'ed -> if a memory device needs it to
create cells we need to parse the device content, but I find it
crappy to start device-specific parsing in the registration handler.
So probe of the memory device is not a good place for this, nor is the
registration of the layout driver. Yet, we need to do the same
operation upon two different "events".
This notifier mechanism is a clean and easy way to get notified and
implement a callback which is also not blocking the thread doing the
initial registration. I am personally not bothered using it only
internally. If you have another mechanism in mind to perform a similar
operation, or a way to avoid this need I'll do the switch.
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-03 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-22 17:48 [PATCH v10 0/3] NVMEM cells in sysfs Miquel Raynal
2023-09-22 17:48 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] nvmem: core: Rework layouts to become platform devices Miquel Raynal
2023-09-28 20:24 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-10-02 9:23 ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2023-10-03 9:43 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-10-05 14:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-10-02 9:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-02 15:16 ` Miquel Raynal
2023-09-22 17:48 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] ABI: sysfs-nvmem-cells: Expose cells through sysfs Miquel Raynal
2023-09-22 17:48 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] nvmem: core: " Miquel Raynal
2023-09-28 15:31 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-09-29 5:18 ` Rafał Miłecki
2023-10-01 15:59 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231003114326.7c61b07c@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luka.perkov@sartura.hr \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.marko@sartura.hr \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox