From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52640E92FDF for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 04:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229989AbjJFEVc (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2023 00:21:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39746 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229876AbjJFEVa (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Oct 2023 00:21:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EFFDDB for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 21:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1c877f27e8fso13736335ad.1 for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 21:21:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1696566089; x=1697170889; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=31a7+5f+dKEUOjTapfT2dmGxD91zYjZdh7R9akPGW1Y=; b=XnQhiNzTpVp1s3lQ4cNxN7gDMaIo8+CKS5Qu9MWe7VHjPsNAsw01dzkM35kyDCYpPd SJQh23ZKJ9WSbeLCAp5iZJSwUSEnIbse8IPv7ab0URZYdexztqDRISg1Jz4/Najhe64P GLCMJzDEyAO7VjLo5UvjJCZ7mIJu5B13bAJYc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696566089; x=1697170889; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=31a7+5f+dKEUOjTapfT2dmGxD91zYjZdh7R9akPGW1Y=; b=cfBULixvwby2ZO0WOlqs+sapmI0UoISPKV/8hx2n/NQtNxhqN79H+D3E4xN3JqUlk5 6iN52VzYuuLXAn3a/32g1PaRcWB4dy5KSfbHNG7gochRo7g5BiF8LfQWn7QpZ/eY+Wgj K8LWjTdv0W6Cq/QE4ew7fmPsYZrB1afXOUjRjPXuvoi3nQ57rQdw0eq7J9zbSZ5Y5yaI skb0IPWc83Ohun4YQy7I2FTzan7DvTJ7rGaNWMoXGtwyl36IA5M3zlbWgzrvG2kh1cTj ydkvqbEmr/l8imvoRk7lNqDFm4hHSzC/9hgM6XRUMMf2OmE3Il6bjPzUaDQ0qLu80vcW TeRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxJ1tsTexBIuS+d0mE3zaRnocsI87Rd/bloBNL/CBg0ZqazlgK4 5vTqahAhHBg2NnAby0nK5lgdXg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGopr7FkMNaDgBjublbZIBMMlQiWD+3JIFSW0Wg9pUK8sYj3ONwZZMOK+8xPV5llqQjeKeInA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8649:b0:1bb:9c45:130f with SMTP id y9-20020a170902864900b001bb9c45130fmr6189953plt.69.1696566088853; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 21:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2401:fa00:8f:203:4afa:2f75:6a8f:b6ea]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jb17-20020a170903259100b001c8836a3795sm2619729plb.271.2023.10.05.21.18.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Oct 2023 21:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 13:18:37 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: John Johansen Cc: Anil Altinay , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , LKLM , Sergey Senozhatsky , Peter Zijlstra , Tomasz Figa , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] apparmor: global buffers spin lock may get contended Message-ID: <20231006041837.GA17924@google.com> References: <4595e7b4-ea31-5b01-f636-259e84737dfc@canonical.com> <31d6e8d6-0747-a282-746b-5c144a9970bb@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <31d6e8d6-0747-a282-746b-5c144a9970bb@canonical.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (23/06/26 17:31), John Johansen wrote: > On 6/26/23 16:33, Anil Altinay wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > I was wondering if you get a chance to work on patch v4. Please let me know if you need help with testing. > > > > yeah, testing help is always much appreciated. I have a v4, and I am > working on 3 alternate version to compare against, to help give a better > sense if we can get away with simplifying or tweak the scaling. > > I should be able to post them out some time tonight. Hi John, Did you get a chance to post v4? I may be able to give it some testing on our real-life case.