Re: EEVDF and NUMA balancing

Vincent Guittot
2024-01-05T16:00:43Z

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 15:51, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> > Your system is calling the polling mode and not the default
> > cpuidle_idle_call() ? This could explain why I don't see such problem
> > on my system which doesn't have polling
> >
> > Are you forcing the use of polling mode ?
> > If yes, could you check that this problem disappears without forcing
> > polling mode ?
>
> I expanded the code in do_idle to:
>
> if (cpu_idle_force_poll) { c1++;
> tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick();
> cpu_idle_poll();
> } else if (tick_check_broadcast_expired()) { c2++;
> tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick();
> cpu_idle_poll();
> } else { c3++;
> cpuidle_idle_call();
> }
>
> Later, I have:
>
> trace_printk("force poll: %d: c1: %d, c2: %d, c3: %d\n",cpu_idle_force_poll, c1, c2, c3);
> flush_smp_call_function_queue();
> schedule_idle();
>
> force poll, c1 and c2 are always 0, and c3 is always some non-zero value.
> Sometimes small (often 1), and sometimes large (304 or 305).
>
> So I don't think it's calling cpu_idle_poll().

I agree that something else

>
> x86 has TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG defined to be a non zero value, which I think
> is sufficient to cause the issue.

Could you trace trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi() ans csd traces as well ?
I don't understand what set need_resched() in your case; having in
mind that I don't see the problem on my Arm systems and IIRC Peter
said that he didn't face the problem on his x86 system.

>
> julia