From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D294BCD612F for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 19:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1378455AbjJITvo (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:51:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33540 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346683AbjJITvm (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:51:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C13894 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-694f75deb1aso4347897b3a.0 for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 12:51:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1696881100; x=1697485900; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=K2qK3/RPJGcH/Y4e4B3fj0OlYjfNOjt5OVjwpAAdhYw=; b=RWW4Vv7ZBjTnjdSaOZsWTZ934w9WMWvGtMzJhHsD6b7A+MzCg3dciS0VjCE788pSU3 zXjzrUyNkXXz85DQdO6aEM/YZcUfAapzcc/2pUzuase9IJcJC3DgjBTkGgRT//XgYbLn 4ccdiy8geLYkbU/nIe1wbJxAXOaPZKF6wh2Ys= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696881100; x=1697485900; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=K2qK3/RPJGcH/Y4e4B3fj0OlYjfNOjt5OVjwpAAdhYw=; b=ABDPUCikfDwGRHR0Ax1ZvGLsdYvkHMKt8H0r8oNbOgzvS63vJRx8j85f++xBP3jixF ZOPFtXBovOfDpfFEWJO+dmEzePLApxDznJ2Uf0QCoJinOrn9LYhp4G1T4ilFPxhUWA6A vopG87cCIyrE+z6nQ3CzXrN3qFm8X2PKMCgUN1n4hTvbotXbJp4lc1UbmgF9x3qVYajg RqjDzxRqNhGgsnYrCtgKMYX04jH2+gh7nXBROLLgw7FThfx5XIPOogM6FlCY7jMlIXFG cO39K6bTW4C+DbymP+QYtuCtco0995s6LoCcpFhY+SFl2/iJQpXX5ASVViCjggo0dco1 ytPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz8PFQGn7tixNwPsehGJ+d5lAcnHVCbkEX98aLzlLP97BGo/l8k jcG93rVOmied89iiqaICwmo0zA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErKu5nijcGQNO4C5TTmPCzq/DLxiROmTLvRJ5rM8E6o7Mvo2fsCJGqYmjn1eMmUSEOjczf4w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d8b:b0:27c:df02:88b3 with SMTP id oj11-20020a17090b4d8b00b0027cdf0288b3mr787340pjb.8.1696881099801; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 12:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (198-0-35-241-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [198.0.35.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ct19-20020a17090af59300b0026b3a86b0d5sm8806769pjb.33.2023.10.09.12.51.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Oct 2023 12:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 12:51:37 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Mark Brown Cc: Martin =?utf-8?Q?Povi=C5=A1er?= , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , asahi@lists.linux.dev, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Tom Rix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: apple: mca: Annotate struct mca_data with __counted_by Message-ID: <202310091251.B877B4AF@keescook> References: <20230922175050.work.819-kees@kernel.org> <202310061321.E7247C52B@keescook> <6c7db067-78f2-4637-8064-3dc7c0489b90@sirena.org.uk> <202310090958.27F5025BDB@keescook> <6d665575-7658-4619-a763-438e0d3aaf2e@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6d665575-7658-4619-a763-438e0d3aaf2e@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 08:43:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Off the top of my head I'd say wait at least three weeks for this sort > of patch before doing anything and then prefer to do a resend, that's > should avoid most issues. If you're going to just apply things yourself > I'd suggest waiting for -rc6 or so before doing so (assuming the patches > were initially sent reasonably early), that does seem like a reasonable > backstop so things don't completely miss releases. Okay, sounds good. Thanks for the clarification! -- Kees Cook