From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 12/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 23:08:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231009230858.3444834-13-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009230858.3444834-1-rananta@google.com>
From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Add a new test case to the vpmu_counter_access test to check
if PMU registers or their bits for unimplemented counters are not
accessible or are RAZ, as expected.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
---
.../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++--
.../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
index e92af3c0db03..788386ac0894 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
* Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
*
* This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event
- * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets, and if the guest can access
- * those counters.
+ * counters (PMCR_EL0.N) that userspace sets, if the guest can access
+ * those counters, and if the guest cannot access any other counters.
* This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host.
*/
#include <kvm_util.h>
@@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ static void write_pmevtypern(int n, unsigned long val)
}
/*
- * The pmc_accessor structure has pointers to PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
+ * The pmc_accessor structure has pointers to PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
* accessors that test cases will use. Each of the accessors will
- * either directly reads/writes PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
+ * either directly reads/writes PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
* (i.e. {read,write}_pmev{cnt,type}rn()), or reads/writes them through
* PMXEV{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 (i.e. {read,write}_sel_ev{cnt,type}r()).
*
@@ -291,25 +291,85 @@ static void test_access_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx)
pmc_idx, PMC_ACC_TO_IDX(acc), read_data, write_data);
}
+#define INVALID_EC (-1ul)
+uint64_t expected_ec = INVALID_EC;
+uint64_t op_end_addr;
+
static void guest_sync_handler(struct ex_regs *regs)
{
uint64_t esr, ec;
esr = read_sysreg(esr_el1);
ec = (esr >> ESR_EC_SHIFT) & ESR_EC_MASK;
- __GUEST_ASSERT(0, "PC: 0x%lx; ESR: 0x%lx; EC: 0x%lx", regs->pc, esr, ec);
+
+ __GUEST_ASSERT(op_end_addr && (expected_ec == ec),
+ "PC: 0x%lx; ESR: 0x%lx; EC: 0x%lx; EC expected: 0x%lx",
+ regs->pc, esr, ec, expected_ec);
+
+ /* Will go back to op_end_addr after the handler exits */
+ regs->pc = op_end_addr;
+
+ /*
+ * Clear op_end_addr, and setting expected_ec to INVALID_EC
+ * as a sign that an exception has occurred.
+ */
+ op_end_addr = 0;
+ expected_ec = INVALID_EC;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Run the given operation that should trigger an exception with the
+ * given exception class. The exception handler (guest_sync_handler)
+ * will reset op_end_addr to 0, and expected_ec to INVALID_EC, and
+ * will come back to the instruction at the @done_label.
+ * The @done_label must be a unique label in this test program.
+ */
+#define TEST_EXCEPTION(ec, ops, done_label) \
+{ \
+ extern int done_label; \
+ \
+ WRITE_ONCE(op_end_addr, (uint64_t)&done_label); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(ec != INVALID_EC); \
+ WRITE_ONCE(expected_ec, ec); \
+ dsb(ish); \
+ ops; \
+ asm volatile(#done_label":"); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(!op_end_addr); \
+ GUEST_ASSERT(expected_ec == INVALID_EC); \
+}
+
+/*
+ * Tests for reading/writing registers for the unimplemented event counter
+ * specified by @pmc_idx (>= PMCR_EL0.N).
+ */
+static void test_access_invalid_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx)
+{
+ /*
+ * Reading/writing the event count/type registers should cause
+ * an UNDEFINED exception.
+ */
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx), inv_rd_cntr);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_cntr(pmc_idx, 0), inv_wr_cntr);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->read_typer(pmc_idx), inv_rd_typer);
+ TEST_EXCEPTION(ESR_EC_UNKNOWN, acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, 0), inv_wr_typer);
+ /*
+ * The bit corresponding to the (unimplemented) counter in
+ * {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR}_EL1 registers should be RAZ.
+ */
+ test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, 1);
+ test_bitmap_pmu_regs(pmc_idx, 0);
}
/*
* The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of
* event counters.
* Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N, and
- * if reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters can work
- * as expected.
+ * if reading/writing PMU registers for implemented or unimplemented
+ * counters can work as expected.
*/
static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
{
- uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n;
+ uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n, unimp_mask;
int i, pmc;
__GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS,
@@ -324,15 +384,32 @@ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
"Expected PMCR.N: 0x%lx, PMCR.N: 0x%lx",
pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n);
+ /*
+ * Make sure that (RAZ) bits corresponding to unimplemented event
+ * counters in {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR}_EL1 registers are reset to zero.
+ * (NOTE: bits for implemented event counters are reset to UNKNOWN)
+ */
+ unimp_mask = GENMASK_ULL(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS - 1, pmcr_n);
+ check_bitmap_pmu_regs(unimp_mask, false);
+
/*
* Tests for reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters.
- * Use each combination of PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
+ * Use each combination of PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
*/
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) {
for (pmc = 0; pmc < pmcr_n; pmc++)
test_access_pmc_regs(&pmc_accessors[i], pmc);
}
+ /*
+ * Tests for reading/writing PMU registers for unimplemented counters.
+ * Use each combination of PMEV{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) {
+ for (pmc = pmcr_n; pmc < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS; pmc++)
+ test_access_invalid_pmc_regs(&pmc_accessors[i], pmc);
+ }
+
GUEST_DONE();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
index cb537253a6b9..c42d683102c7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ enum {
#define ESR_EC_SHIFT 26
#define ESR_EC_MASK (ESR_EC_NUM - 1)
+#define ESR_EC_UNKNOWN 0x0
#define ESR_EC_SVC64 0x15
#define ESR_EC_IABT 0x21
#define ESR_EC_DABT 0x25
--
2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 23:08 [PATCH v7 00/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit the number of PMCs on vCPU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Introduce helpers to set the guest's PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-16 19:45 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set the default PMU for the guest before vCPU reset Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-10 22:25 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-13 20:27 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Clear PM{C,I}NTEN{SET,CLR} and PMOVS{SET,CLR} on " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-16 19:44 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-16 21:28 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-17 9:23 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-17 16:59 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-18 21:16 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-18 22:17 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-19 18:46 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-19 19:05 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-19 20:17 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Don't define the sysreg reset() for PM{USERENR,CCFILTR}_EL0 Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-16 19:47 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Add a helper to read a vCPU's PMCR_EL0 Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-16 20:02 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Add a helper to read the number of counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-10 22:30 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-13 5:43 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-13 20:24 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set PMCR_EL0.N for vCPU based on the associated PMU Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-16 13:35 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-16 19:02 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-16 19:15 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-16 21:35 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-17 5:52 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-17 5:55 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-17 16:58 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-17 17:09 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-17 17:25 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-17 18:10 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-17 18:45 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow userspace to limit PMCR_EL0.N for the guest Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-17 15:52 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-17 16:49 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-19 10:45 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-19 18:05 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] tools: Import arm_pmuv3.h Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce vpmu_counter_access test Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-12 11:24 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-12 15:01 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-13 21:05 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-16 10:01 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-16 18:56 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-16 19:05 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-16 19:07 ` Oliver Upton
2023-10-17 14:51 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-17 17:07 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-17 15:48 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-10-17 17:10 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for implemented counters Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-17 18:54 ` Eric Auger
2023-10-17 21:42 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-10-09 23:08 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2023-10-18 6:54 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for unimplemented counters Eric Auger
2023-10-19 18:09 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231009230858.3444834-13-rananta@google.com \
--to=rananta@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox