From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] x86/percpu: Use explicit segment registers in lib/cmpxchg{8,16}b_emu.S
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 18:10:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231012161237.114733-2-ubizjak@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231012161237.114733-1-ubizjak@gmail.com>
PER_CPU_VAR macro is intended to be applied to a symbol, it is not
intended to be used as a selector between %fs and %gs segment
registers for general operands.
The address to these emulation functions is passed in a register, so
use explicit segment registers to access percpu variable instead.
Also add a missing function comment to this_cpu_cmpxchg8b_emu.
No functional changes intended.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg16b_emu.S | 12 ++++++------
arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg16b_emu.S b/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg16b_emu.S
index 6962df315793..2bd8b89bce75 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg16b_emu.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg16b_emu.S
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(this_cpu_cmpxchg16b_emu)
cli
/* if (*ptr == old) */
- cmpq PER_CPU_VAR(0(%rsi)), %rax
+ cmpq %gs:(%rsi), %rax
jne .Lnot_same
- cmpq PER_CPU_VAR(8(%rsi)), %rdx
+ cmpq %gs:8(%rsi), %rdx
jne .Lnot_same
/* *ptr = new */
- movq %rbx, PER_CPU_VAR(0(%rsi))
- movq %rcx, PER_CPU_VAR(8(%rsi))
+ movq %rbx, %gs:(%rsi)
+ movq %rcx, %gs:8(%rsi)
/* set ZF in EFLAGS to indicate success */
orl $X86_EFLAGS_ZF, (%rsp)
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(this_cpu_cmpxchg16b_emu)
/* *ptr != old */
/* old = *ptr */
- movq PER_CPU_VAR(0(%rsi)), %rax
- movq PER_CPU_VAR(8(%rsi)), %rdx
+ movq %gs:(%rsi), %rax
+ movq %gs:8(%rsi), %rdx
/* clear ZF in EFLAGS to indicate failure */
andl $(~X86_EFLAGS_ZF), (%rsp)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S b/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S
index 49805257b125..b7d68d5e2d31 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg8b_emu.S
@@ -24,12 +24,12 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(cmpxchg8b_emu)
pushfl
cli
- cmpl 0(%esi), %eax
+ cmpl (%esi), %eax
jne .Lnot_same
cmpl 4(%esi), %edx
jne .Lnot_same
- movl %ebx, 0(%esi)
+ movl %ebx, (%esi)
movl %ecx, 4(%esi)
orl $X86_EFLAGS_ZF, (%esp)
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(cmpxchg8b_emu)
RET
.Lnot_same:
- movl 0(%esi), %eax
+ movl (%esi), %eax
movl 4(%esi), %edx
andl $(~X86_EFLAGS_ZF), (%esp)
@@ -53,18 +53,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmpxchg8b_emu)
#ifndef CONFIG_UML
+/*
+ * Emulate 'cmpxchg8b %fs:(%esi)'
+ *
+ * Inputs:
+ * %esi : memory location to compare
+ * %eax : low 32 bits of old value
+ * %edx : high 32 bits of old value
+ * %ebx : low 32 bits of new value
+ * %ecx : high 32 bits of new value
+ *
+ * Notably this is not LOCK prefixed and is not safe against NMIs
+ */
SYM_FUNC_START(this_cpu_cmpxchg8b_emu)
pushfl
cli
- cmpl PER_CPU_VAR(0(%esi)), %eax
+ cmpl %fs:(%esi), %eax
jne .Lnot_same2
- cmpl PER_CPU_VAR(4(%esi)), %edx
+ cmpl %fs:4(%esi), %edx
jne .Lnot_same2
- movl %ebx, PER_CPU_VAR(0(%esi))
- movl %ecx, PER_CPU_VAR(4(%esi))
+ movl %ebx, %fs:(%esi)
+ movl %ecx, %fs:4(%esi)
orl $X86_EFLAGS_ZF, (%esp)
@@ -72,8 +84,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(this_cpu_cmpxchg8b_emu)
RET
.Lnot_same2:
- movl PER_CPU_VAR(0(%esi)), %eax
- movl PER_CPU_VAR(4(%esi)), %edx
+ movl %fs:(%esi), %eax
+ movl %fs:4(%esi), %edx
andl $(~X86_EFLAGS_ZF), (%esp)
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-12 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 16:10 [PATCH 0/4] [PATCH 0/4] Introduce %rip-relative addressing to PER_CPU_VAR macro Uros Bizjak
2023-10-12 16:10 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2023-10-12 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/percpu: Use explicit segment registers in lib/cmpxchg{8,16}b_emu.S Brian Gerst
2023-10-12 17:54 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-10-12 18:39 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-10-12 21:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-10-12 21:05 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-10-12 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2023-10-26 7:01 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-26 7:15 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-10-12 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/percpu: Correct PER_CPU_VAR usage to include symbol and its addend Uros Bizjak
2023-10-12 16:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/percpu, xen: " Uros Bizjak
2023-10-12 16:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/percpu: Introduce %rip-relative addressing to PER_CPU_VAR macro Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231012161237.114733-2-ubizjak@gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox