public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 14/18] rcu: Conditionally build CPU-hotplug teardown callbacks
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:58:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231013115902.1059735-15-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231013115902.1059735-1-frederic@kernel.org>

Among the three CPU-hotplug teardown RCU callbacks, two of them early
exit if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n, and one is left unchanged. In any case
all of them have an implementation when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n.

Align instead with the common way to deal with CPU-hotplug teardown
callbacks and provide a proper stub when they are not supported.

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/rcutree.h |  11 +++-
 kernel/rcu/tree.c       | 114 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 153cfc7bbffd..46875c4e9f56 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -110,9 +110,16 @@ void rcu_all_qs(void);
 /* RCUtree hotplug events */
 int rcutree_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 int rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
-int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
-void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu);
+int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+#else
+#define rcutree_dead_cpu NULL
+#define rcutree_dying_cpu NULL
+#define rcutree_offline_cpu NULL
+#endif
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_RCUTREE_H */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 2e1e7eadf2cc..f9c6b2680cbb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4237,25 +4237,6 @@ static bool rcu_init_invoked(void)
 	return !!rcu_state.n_online_cpus;
 }
 
-/*
- * Near the end of the offline process.  Trace the fact that this CPU
- * is going offline.
- */
-int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	bool blkd;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
-	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
-
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU))
-		return 0;
-
-	blkd = !!(READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) & rdp->grpmask);
-	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq),
-			       blkd ? TPS("cpuofl-bgp") : TPS("cpuofl"));
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * All CPUs for the specified rcu_node structure have gone offline,
  * and all tasks that were preempted within an RCU read-side critical
@@ -4301,23 +4282,6 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
 	}
 }
 
-/*
- * The CPU has been completely removed, and some other CPU is reporting
- * this fact from process context.  Do the remainder of the cleanup.
- * There can only be one CPU hotplug operation at a time, so no need for
- * explicit locking.
- */
-int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU))
-		return 0;
-
-	WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus, rcu_state.n_online_cpus - 1);
-	// Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
-	tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Propagate ->qsinitmask bits up the rcu_node tree to account for the
  * first CPU in a given leaf rcu_node structure coming online.  The caller
@@ -4470,29 +4434,6 @@ int rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Near the beginning of the process.  The CPU is still very much alive
- * with pretty much all services enabled.
- */
-int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp;
-	struct rcu_node *rnp;
-
-	rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
-	rnp = rdp->mynode;
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-	rnp->ffmask &= ~rdp->grpmask;
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-
-	rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, cpu);
-
-	// nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly
-	tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Mark the specified CPU as being online so that subsequent grace periods
  * (both expedited and normal) will wait on it.  Note that this means that
@@ -4646,7 +4587,60 @@ void rcutree_migrate_callbacks(int cpu)
 		  cpu, rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist),
 		  rcu_segcblist_first_cb(&rdp->cblist));
 }
-#endif
+
+/*
+ * The CPU has been completely removed, and some other CPU is reporting
+ * this fact from process context.  Do the remainder of the cleanup.
+ * There can only be one CPU hotplug operation at a time, so no need for
+ * explicit locking.
+ */
+int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus, rcu_state.n_online_cpus - 1);
+	// Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
+	tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Near the end of the offline process.  Trace the fact that this CPU
+ * is going offline.
+ */
+int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	bool blkd;
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
+
+	blkd = !!(READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) & rdp->grpmask);
+	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, READ_ONCE(rnp->gp_seq),
+			       blkd ? TPS("cpuofl-bgp") : TPS("cpuofl"));
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Near the beginning of the process.  The CPU is still very much alive
+ * with pretty much all services enabled.
+ */
+int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct rcu_data *rdp;
+	struct rcu_node *rnp;
+
+	rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
+	rnp = rdp->mynode;
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+	rnp->ffmask &= ~rdp->grpmask;
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+
+	rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, cpu);
+
+	// nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly
+	tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
 
 /*
  * On non-huge systems, use expedited RCU grace periods to make suspend
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-13 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-13 11:58 [PATCH 00/18] RCU fixes for v6.7 Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 01/18] Revert "checkpatch: Error out if deprecated RCU API used" Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 02/18] srcu: Fix error handling in init_srcu_struct_fields() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 03/18] rcu/tree: Remove superfluous return from void call_rcu* functions Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 04/18] rcu: Add sysfs to provide throttled access to rcu_barrier() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 05/18] rcu: Remove unused function declaration rcu_eqs_special_set() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 06/18] mm: Remove kmem_valid_obj() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 07/18] rcu: Dump memory object info if callback function is invalid Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 08/18] rcu: Eliminate rcu_gp_slow_unregister() false positive Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 09/18] srcu: Fix srcu_struct node grpmask overflow on 64-bit systems Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 12:54   ` David Laight
2023-10-13 14:11     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 10/18] rcu: kmemleak: Ignore kmemleak false positives when RCU-freeing objects Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 11/18] rcu: Use rcu_segcblist_segempty() instead of open coding it Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 12/18] rcu: Assume IRQS disabled from rcu_report_dead() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 13/18] rcu: Assume rcu_report_dead() is always called locally Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-10-13 11:58 ` [PATCH 15/18] rcu: Standardize explicit CPU-hotplug calls Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 16/18] rcu: Comment why callbacks migration can't wait for CPUHP_RCUTREE_PREP Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 17/18] srcu: Fix callbacks acceleration mishandling Frederic Weisbecker
2023-10-13 11:59 ` [PATCH 18/18] srcu: Only accelerate on enqueue time Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231013115902.1059735-15-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox