public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [patch V5 11/39] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup code further
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:23:38 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231017211722.573068907@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20231017200758.877560658@linutronix.de

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Sanitize the microcode scan loop, fixup printks and move the loading
function for builtin microcode next to the place where it is used and mark
it __init.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 76 +++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 60862f6c0ded..bf6e083cc2a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin";
 static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch __read_mostly;
 
 /* last level cache size per core */
-static int llc_size_per_core __ro_after_init;
+static unsigned int llc_size_per_core __ro_after_init;
 
 /* microcode format is extended from prescott processors */
 struct extended_signature {
@@ -296,29 +296,6 @@ static struct microcode_intel *scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size,
 	return patch;
 }
 
-static bool load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
-{
-	unsigned int eax = 1, ebx, ecx = 0, edx;
-	struct firmware fw;
-	char name[30];
-
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
-		return false;
-
-	native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-
-	sprintf(name, "intel-ucode/%02x-%02x-%02x",
-		      x86_family(eax), x86_model(eax), x86_stepping(eax));
-
-	if (firmware_request_builtin(&fw, name)) {
-		cp->size = fw.size;
-		cp->data = (void *)fw.data;
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	return false;
-}
-
 static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
 {
 	struct microcode_intel *mc;
@@ -362,6 +339,28 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
+{
+	unsigned int eax = 1, ebx, ecx = 0, edx;
+	struct firmware fw;
+	char name[30];
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
+		return false;
+
+	native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+
+	sprintf(name, "intel-ucode/%02x-%02x-%02x",
+		x86_family(eax), x86_model(eax), x86_stepping(eax));
+
+	if (firmware_request_builtin(&fw, name)) {
+		cp->size = fw.size;
+		cp->data = (void *)fw.data;
+		return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
 {
 	struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
@@ -434,25 +433,16 @@ void load_ucode_intel_ap(void)
 	apply_microcode_early(&uci);
 }
 
-/* Accessor for microcode pointer */
-static struct microcode_intel *ucode_get_patch(void)
-{
-	return intel_ucode_patch;
-}
-
 void reload_ucode_intel(void)
 {
-	struct microcode_intel *p;
 	struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
 
 	intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
 
-	p = ucode_get_patch();
-	if (!p)
+	uci.mc = intel_ucode_patch;
+	if (!uci.mc)
 		return;
 
-	uci.mc = p;
-
 	apply_microcode_early(&uci);
 }
 
@@ -490,8 +480,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
 	if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
 		return UCODE_ERROR;
 
-	/* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */
-	mc = ucode_get_patch();
+	mc = intel_ucode_patch;
 	if (!mc) {
 		mc = uci->mc;
 		if (!mc)
@@ -682,18 +671,17 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device)
 }
 
 static struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = {
-	.request_microcode_fw             = request_microcode_fw,
-	.collect_cpu_info                 = collect_cpu_info,
-	.apply_microcode                  = apply_microcode_intel,
+	.request_microcode_fw	= request_microcode_fw,
+	.collect_cpu_info	= collect_cpu_info,
+	.apply_microcode	= apply_microcode_intel,
 };
 
-static int __init calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+static __init void calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 	u64 llc_size = c->x86_cache_size * 1024ULL;
 
 	do_div(llc_size, c->x86_max_cores);
-
-	return (int)llc_size;
+	llc_size_per_core = (unsigned int)llc_size;
 }
 
 struct microcode_ops * __init init_intel_microcode(void)
@@ -706,7 +694,7 @@ struct microcode_ops * __init init_intel_microcode(void)
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	llc_size_per_core = calc_llc_size_per_core(c);
+	calc_llc_size_per_core(c);
 
 	return &microcode_intel_ops;
 }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-17 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-17 21:23 [patch V5 00/39] x86/microcode: Cleanup and late loading enhancements Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 01/39] x86/boot/32: Disable stackprotector and tracing for mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 02/39] x86/boot: Use __pa_nodebug() in mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 03/39] x86/boot/32: De-uglify the 2/3 level paging difference " Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 10:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-18 13:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 16:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 04/39] x86/boot/32: Restructure mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 05/39] x86/microcode: Provide CONFIG_MICROCODE_INITRD32 Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 06/39] x86/boot/32: Temporarily map initrd for microcode loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 07/39] x86/microcode/32: Move early loading after paging enable Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 08/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 09/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 10/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify and rename generic_load_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 12/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 13/39] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 14/39] x86/microcode/intel: Switch to kvmalloc() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 15/39] x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 16/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 17/39] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 18/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_find_matching_signature() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 19/39] x86/microcode: Remove pointless apply() invocation Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 20/39] x86/microcode/amd: Use correct per CPU ucode_cpu_info Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 21/39] x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin microcode too Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 22/39] x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin/initrd microcode early Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 23/39] x86/microcode/amd: Use cached microcode for AP load Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 24/39] x86/microcode: Mop up early loading leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 25/39] x86/microcode: Get rid of the schedule work indirection Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 26/39] x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 27/39] x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 28/39] x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 29/39] x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 30/39] x86/microcode: Add per CPU result state Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 31/39] x86/microcode: Add per CPU control field Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 32/39] x86/microcode: Provide new control functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 33/39] x86/microcode: Replace the all-in-one rendevous handler Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 34/39] x86/microcode: Rendezvous and load in NMI Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 35/39] x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentation Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 36/39] x86/apic: Provide apic_force_nmi_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 37/39] x86/microcode: Handle "offline" CPUs correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 38/39] x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision check Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 39/39] x86/microcode/intel: Add a minimum required revision for late loading Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231017211722.573068907@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox