public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [patch V5 16/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_cpu_collect_info()
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:23:45 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231017211722.851573238@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20231017200758.877560658@linutronix.de

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Nothing needs struct ucode_cpu_info. Make it take struct cpu_signature,
let it return a boolean and simplify the implementation. Rename it now
that the silly name clash with collect_cpu_info() is gone.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h            |    4 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c |   33 +++++++++------------------------
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c |    8 +++-----
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
---
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ static inline void init_ia32_feat_ctl(st
 
 extern __noendbr void cet_disable(void);
 
-struct ucode_cpu_info;
+struct cpu_signature;
 
-int intel_cpu_collect_info(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci);
+void intel_collect_cpu_info(struct cpu_signature *sig);
 
 static inline bool intel_cpu_signatures_match(unsigned int s1, unsigned int p1,
 					      unsigned int s2, unsigned int p2)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -66,36 +66,21 @@ static inline unsigned int exttable_size
 	return et->count * EXT_SIGNATURE_SIZE + EXT_HEADER_SIZE;
 }
 
-int intel_cpu_collect_info(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+void intel_collect_cpu_info(struct cpu_signature *sig)
 {
-	unsigned int val[2];
-	unsigned int family, model;
-	struct cpu_signature csig = { 0 };
-	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+	sig->sig = cpuid_eax(1);
+	sig->pf = 0;
+	sig->rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
 
-	memset(uci, 0, sizeof(*uci));
+	if (x86_model(sig->sig) >= 5 || x86_family(sig->sig) > 6) {
+		unsigned int val[2];
 
-	eax = 0x00000001;
-	ecx = 0;
-	native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-	csig.sig = eax;
-
-	family = x86_family(eax);
-	model  = x86_model(eax);
-
-	if (model >= 5 || family > 6) {
 		/* get processor flags from MSR 0x17 */
 		native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID, val[0], val[1]);
-		csig.pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
+		sig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
 	}
-
-	csig.rev = intel_get_microcode_revision();
-
-	uci->cpu_sig = csig;
-
-	return 0;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_cpu_collect_info);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_collect_cpu_info);
 
 /*
  * Returns 1 if update has been found, 0 otherwise.
@@ -378,7 +363,7 @@ static __init struct microcode_intel *ge
 	if (!(cp.data && cp.size))
 		return NULL;
 
-	intel_cpu_collect_info(uci);
+	intel_collect_cpu_info(&uci->cpu_sig);
 
 	return scan_microcode(cp.data, cp.size, uci);
 }
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/load.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int scan_chunks_sanity_check(stru
 
 static int image_sanity_check(struct device *dev, const struct microcode_header_intel *data)
 {
-	struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
+	struct cpu_signature sig;
 
 	/* Provide a specific error message when loading an older/unsupported image */
 	if (data->hdrver != MC_HEADER_TYPE_IFS) {
@@ -240,11 +240,9 @@ static int image_sanity_check(struct dev
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
+	intel_collect_cpu_info(&sig);
 
-	if (!intel_find_matching_signature((void *)data,
-					   uci.cpu_sig.sig,
-					   uci.cpu_sig.pf)) {
+	if (!intel_find_matching_signature((void *)data, sig.sig, sig.pf)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "cpu signature, processor flags not matching\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-17 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-17 21:23 [patch V5 00/39] x86/microcode: Cleanup and late loading enhancements Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 01/39] x86/boot/32: Disable stackprotector and tracing for mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 02/39] x86/boot: Use __pa_nodebug() in mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 03/39] x86/boot/32: De-uglify the 2/3 level paging difference " Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 10:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-18 13:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 16:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 04/39] x86/boot/32: Restructure mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 05/39] x86/microcode: Provide CONFIG_MICROCODE_INITRD32 Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 06/39] x86/boot/32: Temporarily map initrd for microcode loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 07/39] x86/microcode/32: Move early loading after paging enable Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 08/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 09/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 10/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify and rename generic_load_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 11/39] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup code further Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 12/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 13/39] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 14/39] x86/microcode/intel: Switch to kvmalloc() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 15/39] x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_cpu_collect_info() tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 17/39] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 18/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_find_matching_signature() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 19/39] x86/microcode: Remove pointless apply() invocation Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 20/39] x86/microcode/amd: Use correct per CPU ucode_cpu_info Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 21/39] x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin microcode too Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 22/39] x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin/initrd microcode early Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 23/39] x86/microcode/amd: Use cached microcode for AP load Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 24/39] x86/microcode: Mop up early loading leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 25/39] x86/microcode: Get rid of the schedule work indirection Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 26/39] x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 27/39] x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 28/39] x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 29/39] x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 30/39] x86/microcode: Add per CPU result state Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 31/39] x86/microcode: Add per CPU control field Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 32/39] x86/microcode: Provide new control functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 33/39] x86/microcode: Replace the all-in-one rendevous handler Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 34/39] x86/microcode: Rendezvous and load in NMI Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 35/39] x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentation Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 36/39] x86/apic: Provide apic_force_nmi_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 37/39] x86/microcode: Handle "offline" CPUs correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 38/39] x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision check Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37   ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 39/39] x86/microcode/intel: Add a minimum required revision for late loading Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231017211722.851573238@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox