From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [patch V5 34/39] x86/microcode: Rendezvous and load in NMI
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:24:10 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231017211723.856859665@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20231017200758.877560658@linutronix.de
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
stop_machine() does not prevent the spin-waiting sibling from handling
an NMI, which is obviously violating the whole concept of rendezvous.
Implement a static branch right in the beginning of the NMI handler
which is nopped out except when enabled by the late loading mechanism.
The late loader enables the static branch before stop_machine() is
invoked. Each CPU has an nmi_enable in its control structure which
indicates whether the CPU should go into the update routine.
This is required to bridge the gap between enabling the branch and
actually being at the point where it is required to enter the loader
wait loop.
Each CPU which arrives in the stopper thread function sets that flag and
issues a self NMI right after that. If the NMI function sees the flag
clear, it returns. If it's set it clears the flag and enters the
rendezvous.
This is safe against a real NMI which hits in between setting the flag
and sending the NMI to itself. The real NMI will be swallowed by the
microcode update and the self NMI will then let stuff continue.
Otherwise this would end up with a spurious NMI.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 12 ++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 1
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h | 3 +-
arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c | 4 ++
5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h
@@ -72,4 +72,16 @@ static inline u32 intel_get_microcode_re
}
#endif /* !CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL */
+bool microcode_nmi_handler(void);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(microcode_nmi_handler_enable);
+static __always_inline bool microcode_nmi_handler_enabled(void)
+{
+ return static_branch_unlikely(µcode_nmi_handler_enable);
+}
+#else
+static __always_inline bool microcode_nmi_handler_enabled(void) { return false; }
+#endif
+
#endif /* _ASM_X86_MICROCODE_H */
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/firmware.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
#include <asm/perf_event.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -265,8 +267,10 @@ struct microcode_ctrl {
enum sibling_ctrl ctrl;
enum ucode_state result;
unsigned int ctrl_cpu;
+ bool nmi_enabled;
};
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(microcode_nmi_handler_enable);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct microcode_ctrl, ucode_ctrl);
static atomic_t late_cpus_in;
@@ -282,7 +286,8 @@ static bool wait_for_cpus(atomic_t *cnt)
udelay(1);
- if (!(timeout % USEC_PER_MSEC))
+ /* If invoked directly, tickle the NMI watchdog */
+ if (!microcode_ops->use_nmi && !(timeout % USEC_PER_MSEC))
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
/* Prevent the late comers from making progress and let them time out */
@@ -298,7 +303,8 @@ static bool wait_for_ctrl(void)
if (this_cpu_read(ucode_ctrl.ctrl) != SCTRL_WAIT)
return true;
udelay(1);
- if (!(timeout % 1000))
+ /* If invoked directly, tickle the NMI watchdog */
+ if (!microcode_ops->use_nmi && !(timeout % 1000))
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
return false;
@@ -374,7 +380,7 @@ static void load_primary(unsigned int cp
}
}
-static int load_cpus_stopped(void *unused)
+static bool microcode_update_handler(void)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -383,7 +389,29 @@ static int load_cpus_stopped(void *unuse
else
load_secondary(cpu);
- /* No point to wait here. The CPUs will all wait in stop_machine(). */
+ touch_nmi_watchdog();
+ return true;
+}
+
+bool microcode_nmi_handler(void)
+{
+ if (!this_cpu_read(ucode_ctrl.nmi_enabled))
+ return false;
+
+ this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.nmi_enabled, false);
+ return microcode_update_handler();
+}
+
+static int load_cpus_stopped(void *unused)
+{
+ if (microcode_ops->use_nmi) {
+ /* Enable the NMI handler and raise NMI */
+ this_cpu_write(ucode_ctrl.nmi_enabled, true);
+ apic->send_IPI(smp_processor_id(), NMI_VECTOR);
+ } else {
+ /* Just invoke the handler directly */
+ microcode_update_handler();
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -404,8 +432,14 @@ static int load_late_stop_cpus(void)
*/
store_cpu_caps(&prev_info);
+ if (microcode_ops->use_nmi)
+ static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(µcode_nmi_handler_enable);
+
stop_machine_cpuslocked(load_cpus_stopped, NULL, cpu_online_mask);
+ if (microcode_ops->use_nmi)
+ static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(µcode_nmi_handler_enable);
+
/* Analyze the results */
for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpu_present_mask, &cpus_booted_once_mask) {
switch (per_cpu(ucode_ctrl.result, cpu)) {
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ static struct microcode_ops microcode_in
.collect_cpu_info = collect_cpu_info,
.apply_microcode = apply_microcode_late,
.finalize_late_load = finalize_late_load,
+ .use_nmi = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64),
};
static __init void calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/internal.h
@@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ struct microcode_ops {
enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode)(int cpu);
int (*collect_cpu_info)(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig);
void (*finalize_late_load)(int result);
- unsigned int nmi_safe : 1;
+ unsigned int nmi_safe : 1,
+ use_nmi : 1;
};
extern struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[];
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include <asm/reboot.h>
#include <asm/cache.h>
#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
+#include <asm/microcode.h>
#include <asm/sev.h>
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
@@ -343,6 +344,9 @@ static noinstr void default_do_nmi(struc
instrumentation_begin();
+ if (microcode_nmi_handler_enabled() && microcode_nmi_handler())
+ goto out;
+
handled = nmi_handle(NMI_LOCAL, regs);
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.normal, handled);
if (handled) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-17 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 21:23 [patch V5 00/39] x86/microcode: Cleanup and late loading enhancements Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 01/39] x86/boot/32: Disable stackprotector and tracing for mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 02/39] x86/boot: Use __pa_nodebug() in mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 03/39] x86/boot/32: De-uglify the 2/3 level paging difference " Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 10:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-18 13:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-18 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-10-20 11:38 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 04/39] x86/boot/32: Restructure mk_early_pgtbl_32() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 05/39] x86/microcode: Provide CONFIG_MICROCODE_INITRD32 Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 06/39] x86/boot/32: Temporarily map initrd for microcode loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 07/39] x86/microcode/32: Move early loading after paging enable Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 08/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUs Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 09/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 10/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify and rename generic_load_microcode() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 11/39] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup code further Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 12/39] x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loading Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:38 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 13/39] x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-load Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 14/39] x86/microcode/intel: Switch to kvmalloc() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 15/39] x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 16/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 17/39] x86/microcode/intel: Reuse intel_cpu_collect_info() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 18/39] x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_find_matching_signature() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 19/39] x86/microcode: Remove pointless apply() invocation Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 20/39] x86/microcode/amd: Use correct per CPU ucode_cpu_info Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 21/39] x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin microcode too Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 22/39] x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin/initrd microcode early Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 23/39] x86/microcode/amd: Use cached microcode for AP load Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:21 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 24/39] x86/microcode: Mop up early loading leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 25/39] x86/microcode: Get rid of the schedule work indirection Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:23 ` [patch V5 26/39] x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 27/39] x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 28/39] x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 29/39] x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 30/39] x86/microcode: Add per CPU result state Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 31/39] x86/microcode: Add per CPU control field Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 32/39] x86/microcode: Provide new control functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 33/39] x86/microcode: Replace the all-in-one rendevous handler Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 35/39] x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentation Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 36/39] x86/apic: Provide apic_force_nmi_on_cpu() Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 37/39] x86/microcode: Handle "offline" CPUs correctly Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 38/39] x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision check Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-20 11:37 ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-24 13:20 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-10-17 21:24 ` [patch V5 39/39] x86/microcode/intel: Add a minimum required revision for late loading Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231017211723.856859665@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox