From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D52CDB47E for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231566AbjJRQXE (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:23:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54878 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230301AbjJRQW5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:22:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25EC2B8 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83113C433C7; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:22:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1697646174; bh=UEcgxYj3ZEPopuz17qufQXDDsCe/+unWDdGOKIvbSt4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nWMAkT4X1otXFlW7ow74vie/BuZZO+NXo8lQYnsoniD3wQL9hYlGdx1dEV2y0QLCL u6DTUTHwsBWYv9y1JvaSiAEujqO6p4X6OCH7U/hp+zmaVD28v5y2Kq1yRwbaF9blpz DVhOVHKldFM3HNVxEAEQZSKFXG1w8mO64TcOD/KI= Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:22:53 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Liu Shixin , Patrick Wang , Kefeng Wang , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] mm: kmemleak: use mem_pool_free() to free object Message-Id: <20231018092253.a12815afa7db9049f95fc195@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231018102952.3339837-1-liushixin2@huawei.com> <20231018102952.3339837-6-liushixin2@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:57:50 +0100 Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Could you please reorder this patch before the previous one? If you > > added a Fixes tag, we may want a cc stable as well (as for the other > > patches with a Fixes tag) and it makes more sense to backport it on its > > own without the __create_object() split. Otherwise: > > Ah, ignore this. If we want a cc stable, the whole thing needs > backporting, including the split which is essential for the subsequent > fix. Do we want a cc:stable? That tag wasn't originally included. If so, all seven patches? If "not all seven" then can we please have two series, one for the backport patches, one for next merge window.