public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@gmail.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ipw2x00: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy_pad
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:19:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202310181800.C6F7B42@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017-strncpy-drivers-net-wireless-intel-ipw2x00-ipw2200-c-v2-1-465e10dc817c@google.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 09:48:15PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
> [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
> interfaces.
> 
> `extra` is intended to be NUL-terminated which is evident by the manual
> assignment of a NUL-byte as well as its immediate usage with strlen().
> 
> Moreover, many of these getters and setters are NUL-padding buffers with
> memset():
> 2439  |	memset(&tx_power, 0, sizeof(tx_power));
> 9998  | memset(sys_config, 0, sizeof(struct ipw_sys_config));
> 10084 | memset(tfd, 0, sizeof(*tfd));
> 10261 | memset(&dummystats, 0, sizeof(dummystats));
> ... let's maintain this behavior and NUL-pad our destination buffer.
> 
> Considering the above, a suitable replacement is `strscpy_pad` due to
> the fact that it guarantees both NUL-termination and NUL-padding on the
> destination buffer.
> 
> To be clear, there is no bug in the current implementation as
> MAX_WX_STRING is much larger than the size of the string literals being
> copied from. Also, strncpy() does NUL-pad the destination buffer and
> using strscpy_pad() simply matches that behavior. All in all, there
> should be no functional change but we are one step closer to eliminating
> usage of strncpy().
> 
> Do note that we cannot use the more idiomatic strscpy invocation of
> (dest, src, sizeof(dest)) as the destination buffer cannot have its size
> determined at compile time. So, let's stick with (dest, src, LEN).

Yeah, these interfaces have external buffer size declarations. In this
case, MAX_WX_STRING.

This is probably one of the most difficult set of callbacks to track
down. sysfs might be worse...

But, ultimately, this is a private ioctl handler, and it is all boiled
down to calling ioctl_private_iw_point() (via ioctl_private_call()),
which does the allocation of "extra". The size, which is not passed to
the handler (*sob*), is determined by: get_priv_descr_and_size(), which
is looking at drivers/net/wireless/intel/ipw2x00/ipw2200.c's
ipw_priv_args:

        {
         .cmd = IPW_PRIV_GET_MODE,
         .get_args = IW_PRIV_TYPE_CHAR | IW_PRIV_SIZE_FIXED | MAX_WX_STRING,
         .name = "get_mode"},

So it looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-19  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-17 21:48 [PATCH v2] wifi: ipw2x00: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy_pad Justin Stitt
2023-10-19  1:19 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-10-23 17:26 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202310181800.C6F7B42@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stas.yakovlev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox