From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
christian.koenig@amd.com, kch@nvidia.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, logang@deltatee.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chaitanyak@nvidia.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI/DOE: Expose the DOE features via sysfs
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 21:32:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231019193246.GA16112@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231019165829.GA1381099@bhelgaas>
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:58:29AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:41:57PM +1000, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > + xa_for_each(&pdev->doe_mbs, index, doe_mb) {
> > + xa_for_each(&doe_mb->feats, j, entry)
> > + return a->mode;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
>
> The nested loops that don't test anything look a little weird and
> maybe I'm missing something, but this looks like it returns a->mode if
> any mailbox with a feature exists, and 0 otherwise.
>
> Is that the same as this:
>
> if (pdev->doe_mbs)
> return a->mode;
>
> return 0;
>
> since it sounds like a mailbox must support at least one feature?
In theory it's the same, in practice there *might* be non-compliant
devices which lack support for the discovery feature.
> > + attrs[i].attr.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
> > + "0x%04lX:%02lX", vid, type);
>
> What's the rationale for using "0x" on the vendor ID but not on the
> type? "0x1234:10" hints that the "10" might be decimal since it lacks
> "0x".
>
> Suggest lower-case "%04lx:%02lx" either way.
>
> FWIW, there's no "0x" prefix on the hex vendor IDs in "lspci -n"
> output and dmesg messages like this:
>
> pci 0000:01:00.0: [10de:13b6] type 00
The existing attributes "vendor", "device" etc do emit the "0x".
From drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c:
pci_config_attr(vendor, "0x%04x\n");
pci_config_attr(device, "0x%04x\n");
pci_config_attr(subsystem_vendor, "0x%04x\n");
pci_config_attr(subsystem_device, "0x%04x\n");
pci_config_attr(revision, "0x%02x\n");
pci_config_attr(class, "0x%06x\n");
> I try hard to avoid calling *anything* from the
> pci_create_sysfs_dev_files() path because it has the nasty
> "sysfs_initialized" check and the associated pci_sysfs_init()
> initcall.
What's the purpose of sysfs_initialized anyway?
It was introduced by this historic commit:
https://git.kernel.org/tglx/history/c/f6d553444da2
Can PCI_ROM_RESOURCEs appear after device enumeration but before
the late_initcall stage?
If sysfs_initialized is only needed for PCI_ROM_RESOURCEs, can we
constrain pci_sysfs_init() to those and avoid creating all the
other runtime sysfs attributes in the initcall?
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-13 3:41 [PATCH v9 1/3] PCI/DOE: Rename DOE protocol to feature Alistair Francis
2023-10-13 3:41 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI/DOE: Expose the DOE features via sysfs Alistair Francis
2023-10-17 8:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-11-03 1:27 ` Alistair Francis
2023-10-19 16:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-19 19:32 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2023-10-19 20:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-11-03 2:17 ` Alistair Francis
2024-08-04 5:55 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-10-13 3:41 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] PCI/DOE: Allow enabling DOE without CXL Alistair Francis
2023-10-18 22:24 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] PCI/DOE: Rename DOE protocol to feature Bjorn Helgaas
2023-11-03 0:18 ` Alistair Francis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231019193246.GA16112@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox