From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] regmap: kunit: Add test for cache sync interaction with ranges
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:19:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231023-regmap-test-window-cache-v1-2-d8a71f441968@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231023-regmap-test-window-cache-v1-0-d8a71f441968@kernel.org>
Hector Martin reports that since when doing a cache sync we enable cache
bypass if the selector register for a range is cached then we might leave
the physical selector register pointing to a different value to that which
we have in the cache. If we then try to write to the page that our cache
tells us is selected we will not update the selector register and write to
the wrong page. Add a test case covering this.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
index f79fd5ec187e..e14cc03a17f6 100644
--- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-kunit.c
@@ -442,12 +442,20 @@ static struct regmap_range_cfg test_range = {
.range_max = 40,
};
-static bool test_range_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+static bool test_range_window_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
if (reg >= test_range.window_start &&
reg <= test_range.window_start + test_range.window_len)
return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool test_range_all_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ if (test_range_window_volatile(dev, reg))
+ return true;
+
if (reg >= test_range.range_min && reg <= test_range.range_max)
return true;
@@ -465,7 +473,7 @@ static void basic_ranges(struct kunit *test)
config = test_regmap_config;
config.cache_type = t->type;
- config.volatile_reg = test_range_volatile;
+ config.volatile_reg = test_range_all_volatile;
config.ranges = &test_range;
config.num_ranges = 1;
config.max_register = test_range.range_max;
@@ -875,6 +883,59 @@ static void cache_present(struct kunit *test)
regmap_exit(map);
}
+/* Check that caching the window register works with sync */
+static void cache_range_window_reg(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct regcache_types *t = (struct regcache_types *)test->param_value;
+ struct regmap *map;
+ struct regmap_config config;
+ struct regmap_ram_data *data;
+ unsigned int val;
+ int i;
+
+ config = test_regmap_config;
+ config.cache_type = t->type;
+ config.volatile_reg = test_range_window_volatile;
+ config.ranges = &test_range;
+ config.num_ranges = 1;
+ config.max_register = test_range.range_max;
+
+ map = gen_regmap(&config, &data);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(map));
+ if (IS_ERR(map))
+ return;
+
+ /* Write new values to the entire range */
+ for (i = test_range.range_min; i <= test_range.range_max; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, i, 0));
+
+ val = data->vals[test_range.selector_reg] & test_range.selector_mask;
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, val, 2);
+
+ /* Write to the first register in the range to reset the page */
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, test_range.range_min, 0));
+ val = data->vals[test_range.selector_reg] & test_range.selector_mask;
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, val, 0);
+
+ /* Trigger a cache sync */
+ regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+ /* Write to the first register again, the page should be reset */
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, test_range.range_min, 0));
+ val = data->vals[test_range.selector_reg] & test_range.selector_mask;
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, val, 0);
+
+ /* Trigger another cache sync */
+ regcache_mark_dirty(map);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, regcache_sync(map));
+
+ /* Write to the last register again, the page should be reset */
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, regmap_write(map, test_range.range_max, 0));
+ val = data->vals[test_range.selector_reg] & test_range.selector_mask;
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, val, 2);
+}
+
struct raw_test_types {
const char *name;
@@ -1217,6 +1278,7 @@ static struct kunit_case regmap_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_sync_patch, real_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_drop, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_present, sparse_cache_types_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(cache_range_window_reg, real_cache_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raw_read_defaults_single, raw_test_types_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(raw_read_defaults, raw_test_types_gen_params),
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-23 17:19 [PATCH 0/2] regmap: kunit: Add test for cache sync interaction with range selectors Mark Brown
2023-10-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] regmap: kunit: Fix marking of the range window as volatile Mark Brown
2023-10-23 17:19 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2023-10-26 18:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] regmap: kunit: Add test for cache sync interaction with range selectors Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231023-regmap-test-window-cache-v1-2-d8a71f441968@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcan@marcan.st \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox