Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] device property: Implement device_is_big_endian()

Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-12-18T11:06:06Z

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:56 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:35:04AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 03:49:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:19:22PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:21:29PM -0500, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 10:08 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 4:33 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 03:27:30PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 07:25:35AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 09:42:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thank you, Greg.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Bart, would it be still possible to take this into next?
> > > > > > > > > > I would like to have at least this patch applied (with the first user)
> > > > > > > > > > to allow conversion of others (I have some more users of new API).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Okay, seems we missed v6.7 with this, can you then prepare an immutable
> > > > > > > > > branch / tag with this, so other maintainers can pull in case it's needed?
> > > > > > > > > (I have something against tty already and perhaps something else, let's
> > > > > > > > > see.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It arrived too late in the cycle, I needed to send my PR earlier this
> > > > > > > > time as I was OoO this week.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Greg, will you take this patch through your tree and provide me with
> > > > > > > an immutable tag for this cycle?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sure, let me catch up with patches after I return from Plumbers next
> > > > > > week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope Plumbers went well!
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the delay, immutable tag can be found at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git device_is_big_endian-6.8-rc1
> > > > for anyone to pull from now.
> > >
> > > No problem and thank you!
> > >
> > > Bart, can you pull that? Or should I to my tree and then push with other
> > > GPIO patches?
> >
> > Ugh, this is rebased on top of 6.7-rc3...
> >
> > My tree is based on rc1, if I pull it, then it'll be a mess.
>
> But v6.7-rc3 is something that is already in the upstream.
> I don't see how it can be more "mess" with this. Whatever...
>

My for-next branch is based on v6.7-rc1 (as it should IIUC) and if I
now pull Greg's tag, I will be sending rc1-rc3 stuff to Linus Torvalds
in addition to the GPIO changes for v6.8. I bet he will not appreciate
it.

Greg: Is it too late to have this rebased on top of v6.7-rc1 instead?

Bartosz

> > Andy: How badly do you want it in v6.8? Can this wait until after the
> > merge window?
>
> I waited for a cycle already with this...
>
> OTOH GPIO part is not anyhow critical from the semantic point of view.
> Since the main patch is in Greg's tree I'll survive with GPIO stuff
> going next cycle.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>