From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
michael.christie@oracle.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
mjguzik@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com, shakeelb@google.com,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:00:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231027025029-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db40353c-bee5-491c-b301-f994258ed0f9@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:11:47PM +0530, Abhinav Singh wrote:
> On 10/27/23 12:07, Abhinav Singh wrote:
> > This patch fixes the warning about directly dereferencing a pointer
> > tagged with __rcu annotation.
> >
> > Dereferencing the pointers tagged with __rcu directly should
> > always be avoided according to the docs.
> There is a rcu helper
> > functions rcu_dereference(...) to use when dereferencing a __rcu
> > pointer. This functions returns the non __rcu tagged pointer which
> > can be dereferenced just like a normal pointers.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/fork.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > index 10917c3e1f03..e78649974669 100644
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -2369,7 +2369,7 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> > retval = -EAGAIN;
> > if (is_rlimit_overlimit(task_ucounts(p), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC))) {
> > - if (p->real_cred->user != INIT_USER &&
> > + if (rcu_dereference(p->real_cred)->user != INIT_USER &&
> > !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
> > }
> > @@ -2690,9 +2690,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> > * tasklist_lock with adding child to the process tree
> > * for propagate_has_child_subreaper optimization.
> > */
> > - p->signal->has_child_subreaper = p->real_parent->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> > - p->real_parent->signal->is_child_subreaper;
> > - list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
> > + p->signal->has_child_subreaper = rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> > + rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->is_child_subreaper;
> > + list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->children);
> > list_add_tail_rcu(&p->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
> > attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
> > attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID);
>
> For this particular file I have resolved the rcu pointer dereferencing issue
> and I have tested the above by using qemu using this command
> qemu-system-x86_64 \
> -m 2G \
> -smp 2 \
> -kernel /home/abhinav/linux_work/linux/arch/x86/boot/bzImage \
> -append "console=ttyS0 root=/dev/sda earlyprintk=serial net.ifnames=0" \
> -drive file=/home/abhinav/linux_work/boot_images/bullseye.img,format=raw \
> -net user,host=10.0.2.10,hostfwd=tcp:127.0.0.1:10021-:22 \
> -net nic,model=e1000 \
> -enable-kvm \
> -nographic \
> -pidfile vm.pid \
> 2>&1 | tee vm.log
> it booted without any issues.
Did you enable lockdep in your kernel?
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and CONFIG_PROVE_RCU in particular.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-27 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-25 22:28 [PATCH] Fixing warning of directly dereferencing __rcu tagged Abhinav Singh
2023-10-25 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-25 23:27 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-25 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-26 12:16 ` [PATCH v2] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 13:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 14:06 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-10-26 14:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-26 15:07 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-10-26 15:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 15:37 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 15:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-27 6:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Abhinav Singh
2023-10-27 6:41 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-27 7:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-10-27 6:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 12:18 ` [PATCH] Fixing warning of directly dereferencing __rcu tagged Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 12:27 ` [PATCH] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-27 12:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-10-28 10:22 ` [PATCH v3] " Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 10:31 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 12:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-28 20:43 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 20:46 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-11-03 6:30 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-12 19:30 ` [PATCH v4] " Abhinav Singh
2023-11-12 19:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-11-12 19:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-12 20:18 ` Abhinav Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231027025029-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox