From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E597C25B6E for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345747AbjJ0Lji (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:39:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60304 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230101AbjJ0Ljg (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:39:36 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C55EC2; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:39:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1698406774; x=1729942774; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=sCLsYII0iIYQL0RY7KUb5/cg100s9wFU25OabDcN7+A=; b=fy5TRHT5gil3csVDsdlebTfrTAZQIdcczgDYCijCMrLpSR0sUGgV9yJt GRAiMpBR8SOJnPItwuRBs9l8lY/sMexHtt0kdcRnEWbKQRPp+Gziu07uV bvPlcqjtD+rVx3Jmi7kmt2QXHg0mWCXz6WxPRkrxX+otK9a1PjCWGvS9o 4QTm24qYH0liyQmBDwOq6T5OIA/aX6/NcK2BGCTBeGTvAvgI7JNdIltEh 8XIFjjOsSpP2QV9Iul/1RrQina3SJ+QhQKAHmvBa+7gTPR1DAyZZ2LfG6 t8OBy8VWQpTwP77v+nvQD1k5pyk0n4aDRJgzGWsTO7l/4mOXmG0w9FkV4 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10875"; a="579436" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,256,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="579436" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Oct 2023 04:39:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10875"; a="876309651" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,256,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="876309651" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 8917679a5d3e) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2023 04:39:30 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 8917679a5d3e with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qwLBY-000Amc-29; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:39:28 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 19:39:19 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Linhua Xu , Linus Walleij Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Orson Zhai , Baolin Wang , Chunyan Zhang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , lh xu , Linhua Xu , Zhirong Qiu , Xiongpeng Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/6] pinctrl: sprd: Increase the range of register values Message-ID: <202310271959.VUpjvnai-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231027071426.17724-5-Linhua.xu@unisoc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231027071426.17724-5-Linhua.xu@unisoc.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linhua, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on linusw-pinctrl/devel] [also build test WARNING on linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master v6.6-rc7 next-20231026] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Linhua-Xu/pinctrl-sprd-Modify-pull-up-parameters/20231027-151737 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231027071426.17724-5-Linhua.xu%40unisoc.com patch subject: [PATCH V3 4/6] pinctrl: sprd: Increase the range of register values config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231027/202310271959.VUpjvnai-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231027/202310271959.VUpjvnai-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310271959.VUpjvnai-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:29: >> drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h:21: warning: "BIT_MASK" redefined 21 | #define BIT_MASK GENMASK(7, 0) | In file included from include/linux/ratelimit_types.h:5, from include/linux/printk.h:9, from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22, from arch/m68k/include/asm/bug.h:32, from include/linux/bug.h:5, from include/linux/thread_info.h:13, from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5, from ./arch/m68k/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1, from include/linux/preempt.h:79, from include/linux/spinlock.h:56, from include/linux/wait.h:9, from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8, from include/linux/fs.h:6, from include/linux/debugfs.h:15, from drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.c:7: include/linux/bits.h:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition 9 | #define BIT_MASK(nr) (UL(1) << ((nr) % BITS_PER_LONG)) | vim +/BIT_MASK +21 drivers/pinctrl/sprd/pinctrl-sprd.h 18 19 #define NUM_MASK GENMASK(10, 0) 20 #define TYPE_MASK GENMASK(3, 0) > 21 #define BIT_MASK GENMASK(7, 0) 22 #define WIDTH_MASK GENMASK(3, 0) 23 #define REG_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) 24 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki