public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	michael.christie@oracle.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	mjguzik@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com, shakeelb@google.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 08:20:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231028081915-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231028102247.404488-1-singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>

On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 03:52:47PM +0530, Abhinav Singh wrote:
> This patch fixes the warning about directly dereferencing a pointer
> tagged with __rcu annotation.
> 
> Dereferencing the pointers tagged with __rcu directly should
> always be avoided according to the docs. There is a rcu helper
> function rcu_dereference(...) to use when dereferencing a __rcu
> pointer. This function returns the non __rcu tagged pointer which
> can be dereferenced just like a normal pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2 : added rcu_dereference(...) at line 2694
> v2 -> v3 : added rcu_dereference(...) at line 2695
> 
>  kernel/fork.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 10917c3e1f03..e78649974669 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -2369,7 +2369,7 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
>  
>  	retval = -EAGAIN;
>  	if (is_rlimit_overlimit(task_ucounts(p), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC))) {
> -		if (p->real_cred->user != INIT_USER &&
> +		if (rcu_dereference(p->real_cred)->user != INIT_USER &&
>  		    !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>  			goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
>  	}
> @@ -2690,9 +2690,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
>  			 * tasklist_lock with adding child to the process tree
>  			 * for propagate_has_child_subreaper optimization.
>  			 */
> -			p->signal->has_child_subreaper = p->real_parent->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> -							 p->real_parent->signal->is_child_subreaper;
> -			list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
> +			p->signal->has_child_subreaper = rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
> +							rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->is_child_subreaper;
> +			list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->children);
>  			list_add_tail_rcu(&p->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
>  			attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
>  			attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID);
> -- 
> 2.39.2


You seem to just ignore review comments. NAK. I'm not going to review this anymore.


-- 
MST


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-28 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 22:28 [PATCH] Fixing warning of directly dereferencing __rcu tagged Abhinav Singh
2023-10-25 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-25 23:27   ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-25 23:50     ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-26 12:16       ` [PATCH v2] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 13:14         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 14:06           ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-10-26 14:51             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-10-26 15:07               ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-10-26 15:17             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 15:37               ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 15:47                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-27  6:37                   ` [PATCH v3] " Abhinav Singh
2023-10-27  6:41                     ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-27  7:00                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-27  6:50                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-10-26 12:18       ` [PATCH] Fixing warning of directly dereferencing __rcu tagged Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 12:27       ` [PATCH] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning Abhinav Singh
2023-10-26 15:03         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-27 12:22           ` Oleg Nesterov
2023-10-28 10:22             ` [PATCH v3] " Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 10:31               ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 12:20               ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-10-28 20:43                 ` Abhinav Singh
2023-10-28 20:46                   ` Abhinav Singh
2023-11-03  6:30                     ` kernel test robot
2023-11-12 19:30                       ` [PATCH v4] " Abhinav Singh
2023-11-12 19:56                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-11-12 19:58                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-12 20:18                           ` Abhinav Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231028081915-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox