From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86/callthunks: Fix and unify call thunks assembly snippets
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 12:25:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231102112850.3448745-4-ubizjak@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231102112850.3448745-1-ubizjak@gmail.com>
Currently thunk debug macros explicitly define %gs: segment register
prefix for their percpu variables. This is not compatible with
!CONFIG_SMP, which requires non-prefixed percpu variables.
Fix call thunks debug macros to use PER_CPU_VAR macro from percpu.h
to conditionally use %gs: segment register prefix, depending on
CONFIG_SMP.
Finally, unify ASM_ prefixed assembly macros with their non-prefixed
variants. With support of %rip-relative relocations in place, call
thunk templates allow %rip-relative addressing, so unified assembly
snippet can be used everywhere.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 23 +++++++----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index f93e9b96927a..6f677be6bdb9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -59,13 +59,13 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG
# define CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_CALLS \
- incq %gs:__x86_call_count;
+ incq PER_CPU_VAR(__x86_call_count);
# define CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_RETS \
- incq %gs:__x86_ret_count;
+ incq PER_CPU_VAR(__x86_ret_count);
# define CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_STUFFS \
- incq %gs:__x86_stuffs_count;
+ incq PER_CPU_VAR(__x86_stuffs_count);
# define CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_CTXSW \
- incq %gs:__x86_ctxsw_count;
+ incq PER_CPU_VAR(__x86_ctxsw_count);
#else
# define CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_CALLS
# define CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_RETS
@@ -80,9 +80,6 @@
#define CREDIT_CALL_DEPTH \
movq $-1, PER_CPU_VAR(pcpu_hot + X86_call_depth);
-#define ASM_CREDIT_CALL_DEPTH \
- movq $-1, PER_CPU_VAR(pcpu_hot + X86_call_depth);
-
#define RESET_CALL_DEPTH \
xor %eax, %eax; \
bts $63, %rax; \
@@ -95,20 +92,14 @@
CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_CALLS
#define INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH \
- sarq $5, %gs:pcpu_hot + X86_call_depth; \
- CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_CALLS
-
-#define ASM_INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH \
sarq $5, PER_CPU_VAR(pcpu_hot + X86_call_depth); \
CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_CALLS
#else
#define CREDIT_CALL_DEPTH
-#define ASM_CREDIT_CALL_DEPTH
#define RESET_CALL_DEPTH
-#define INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH
-#define ASM_INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH
#define RESET_CALL_DEPTH_FROM_CALL
+#define INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH
#endif
/*
@@ -158,7 +149,7 @@
jnz 771b; \
/* barrier for jnz misprediction */ \
lfence; \
- ASM_CREDIT_CALL_DEPTH \
+ CREDIT_CALL_DEPTH \
CALL_THUNKS_DEBUG_INC_CTXSW
#else
/*
@@ -311,7 +302,7 @@
.macro CALL_DEPTH_ACCOUNT
#ifdef CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING
ALTERNATIVE "", \
- __stringify(ASM_INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH), X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH
+ __stringify(INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH), X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH
#endif
.endm
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-02 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-02 11:25 [PATCH 0/3] Fix and unify call thunks assembly snippets Uros Bizjak
2023-11-02 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/callthunks: Move call thunk template to .S file Uros Bizjak
2023-11-02 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/callthunks: Handle %rip-relative relocations in call thunk template Uros Bizjak
2023-11-02 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-02 11:50 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-11-02 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-02 12:34 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-11-02 11:25 ` Uros Bizjak [this message]
2023-11-05 8:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/callthunks: Fix and unify call thunks assembly snippets kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231102112850.3448745-4-ubizjak@gmail.com \
--to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox