From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 12/20] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 17:02:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231104000239.367005-13-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231104000239.367005-1-seanjc@google.com>
From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
Add a test to verify that KVM correctly emulates MSR-based accesses to
general purpose counters based on guest CPUID, e.g. that accesses to
non-existent counters #GP and accesses to existent counters succeed.
Note, for compatibility reasons, KVM does not emulate #GP when
MSR_P6_PERFCTR[0|1] is not present (writes should be dropped).
Co-developed-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
index 4d3a5c94b8ba..232b9a80a9db 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
@@ -270,9 +270,95 @@ static void test_arch_events(uint8_t pmu_version, uint64_t perf_capabilities,
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+/*
+ * Limit testing to MSRs that are actually defined by Intel (in the SDM). MSRs
+ * that aren't defined counter MSRs *probably* don't exist, but there's no
+ * guarantee that currently undefined MSR indices won't be used for something
+ * other than PMCs in the future.
+ */
+#define MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS 8
+#define MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS 3
+
+#define GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(insn, msr, expect_gp, vector) \
+__GUEST_ASSERT(expect_gp ? vector == GP_VECTOR : !vector, \
+ "Expected %s on " #insn "(0x%x), got vector %u", \
+ expect_gp ? "#GP" : "no fault", msr, vector) \
+
+static void guest_rd_wr_counters(uint32_t base_msr, uint8_t nr_possible_counters,
+ uint8_t nr_counters)
+{
+ uint8_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_possible_counters; i++) {
+ const uint32_t msr = base_msr + i;
+ const bool expect_success = i < nr_counters;
+
+ /*
+ * KVM drops writes to MSR_P6_PERFCTR[0|1] if the counters are
+ * unsupported, i.e. doesn't #GP and reads back '0'.
+ */
+ const uint64_t expected_val = expect_success ? 0xffff : 0;
+ const bool expect_gp = !expect_success && msr != MSR_P6_PERFCTR0 &&
+ msr != MSR_P6_PERFCTR1;
+ uint8_t vector;
+ uint64_t val;
+
+ vector = wrmsr_safe(msr, 0xffff);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(WRMSR, msr, expect_gp, vector);
+
+ vector = rdmsr_safe(msr, &val);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(RDMSR, msr, expect_gp, vector);
+
+ /* On #GP, the result of RDMSR is undefined. */
+ if (!expect_gp)
+ __GUEST_ASSERT(val == expected_val,
+ "Expected RDMSR(0x%x) to yield 0x%lx, got 0x%lx",
+ msr, expected_val, val);
+
+ vector = wrmsr_safe(msr, 0);
+ GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(WRMSR, msr, expect_gp, vector);
+ }
+ GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void guest_test_gp_counters(void)
+{
+ uint8_t nr_gp_counters = 0;
+ uint32_t base_msr;
+
+ if (guest_get_pmu_version())
+ nr_gp_counters = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
+
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM) &&
+ rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES) & PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES)
+ base_msr = MSR_IA32_PMC0;
+ else
+ base_msr = MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0;
+
+ guest_rd_wr_counters(base_msr, MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS, nr_gp_counters);
+}
+
+static void test_gp_counters(uint8_t pmu_version, uint64_t perf_capabilities,
+ uint8_t nr_gp_counters)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+
+ vm = pmu_vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_test_gp_counters,
+ pmu_version, perf_capabilities);
+
+ vcpu_set_cpuid_property(vcpu, X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS,
+ nr_gp_counters);
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu);
+
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
static void test_intel_counters(void)
{
uint8_t nr_arch_events = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EBX_BIT_VECTOR_LENGTH);
+ uint8_t nr_gp_counters = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
uint8_t pmu_version = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION);
unsigned int i;
uint8_t v, j;
@@ -337,6 +423,11 @@ static void test_intel_counters(void)
for (k = 0; k < nr_arch_events; k++)
test_arch_events(v, perf_caps[i], j, BIT(k));
}
+
+ pr_info("Testing GP counters, PMU version %u, perf_caps = %lx\n",
+ v, perf_caps[i]);
+ for (j = 0; j <= nr_gp_counters; j++)
+ test_gp_counters(v, perf_caps[i], j);
}
}
}
--
2.42.0.869.gea05f2083d-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-04 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-04 0:02 [PATCH v6 00/20] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't allow exposing unsupported architectural events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 12:08 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-06 14:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't enumerate support for fixed counters KVM can't virtualize Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 12:25 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-06 15:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] KVM: x86/pmu: Don't enumerate arch events KVM doesn't support Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 12:41 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-07 7:14 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-07 17:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] KVM: x86/pmu: Always treat Fixed counters as available when supported Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 12:43 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] KVM: x86/pmu: Allow programming events that match unsupported arch events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 12:46 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-07 7:15 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 12:51 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-06 19:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] KVM: selftests: Drop the "name" param from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE() Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 12:52 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 13:00 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-06 19:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h and lib/pmu.c for common PMU assets Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 13:20 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-06 7:19 ` JinrongLiang
2023-11-06 20:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-07 10:51 ` Jinrong Liang
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 13:29 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 13:46 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-06 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of " Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] KVM: selftests: Add functional test for Intel's fixed PMU counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] KVM: selftests: Expand PMU counters test to verify LLC events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to query if the PMU module param is enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to read integer module params Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] KVM: selftests: Query module param to detect FEP in MSR filtering test Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] KVM: selftests: Move KVM_FEP macro into common library header Sean Christopherson
2023-11-04 0:02 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced emulation Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231104000239.367005-13-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox