* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:02 [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-11-06 14:54 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-11-06 17:08 ` Allen Pais
` (2 more replies)
2023-11-06 17:23 ` SeongJae Park
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2023-11-06 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Sasha Levin, mizhang
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hello Greg,
On 06/11/23 6:32 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
I am seeing a build failure with perf:
tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function evlist__add_aux_dummy:
tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:31: error: implicit declaration of function
evlist__dummy_event; did you mean evlist__add_sb_event’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
266 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| evlist__add_sb_event
I think we should drop these three commits:
20a5799cae7dc perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event
7de783c81c7e7 perf tools: Get rid of evlist__add_on_all_cpus()
141ce9207068e perf evlist: Add evlist__add_dummy_on_all_cpus()
Backport was requested here:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAL715WLTjMGQrhm6wWqFSeL_Oq-HzoQd5CqewvLRLv0Xbnibgw@mail.gmail.com/
Thanks,
Harshit
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 14:54 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2023-11-06 17:08 ` Allen Pais
2023-11-06 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-11-07 15:33 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-11-07 20:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Allen Pais @ 2023-11-06 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harshit Mogalapalli
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Sasha Levin, mizhang, patches,
linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
>
> On 06/11/23 6:32 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> > There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> I am seeing a build failure with perf:
>
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function evlist__add_aux_dummy:
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:31: error: implicit declaration of function
> evlist__dummy_event; did you mean evlist__add_sb_event’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 266 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | evlist__add_sb_event
>
>
> I think we should drop these three commits:
>
> 20a5799cae7dc perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event
> 7de783c81c7e7 perf tools: Get rid of evlist__add_on_all_cpus()
> 141ce9207068e perf evlist: Add evlist__add_dummy_on_all_cpus()
>
> Backport was requested here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAL715WLTjMGQrhm6wWqFSeL_Oq-HzoQd5CqewvLRLv0Xbnibgw@mail.gmail.com/
>
Just tested perf build, I see the same errors:
tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function 'evlist__add_aux_dummy':
/linux/tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:24: error: implicit declaration of
function 'evlist__dummy_event'; did you mean 'evlist__add_sb_event'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
evlist__add_sb_event
linux/tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:24: error: initialization makes
pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
Thanks,
Allen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 17:08 ` Allen Pais
@ 2023-11-06 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-11-06 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Allen Pais, Harshit Mogalapalli
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Sasha Levin, mizhang, patches,
linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor,
Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
On 11/6/23 09:08, Allen Pais wrote:
>>
>> On 06/11/23 6:32 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
>>> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> I am seeing a build failure with perf:
>>
>> tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function evlist__add_aux_dummy:
>> tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:31: error: implicit declaration of function
>> evlist__dummy_event; did you mean evlist__add_sb_event’?
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 266 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | evlist__add_sb_event
>>
>>
>> I think we should drop these three commits:
>>
>> 20a5799cae7dc perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event
>> 7de783c81c7e7 perf tools: Get rid of evlist__add_on_all_cpus()
>> 141ce9207068e perf evlist: Add evlist__add_dummy_on_all_cpus()
>>
>> Backport was requested here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAL715WLTjMGQrhm6wWqFSeL_Oq-HzoQd5CqewvLRLv0Xbnibgw@mail.gmail.com/
>>
>
>
> Just tested perf build, I see the same errors:
>
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function 'evlist__add_aux_dummy':
> /linux/tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:24: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'evlist__dummy_event'; did you mean 'evlist__add_sb_event'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> evlist__add_sb_event
> linux/tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:24: error: initialization makes
> pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
Yep, same here (and on 5.10 as well).
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 14:54 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-11-06 17:08 ` Allen Pais
@ 2023-11-07 15:33 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-11-07 20:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2023-11-07 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Sasha Levin, mizhang
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 06/11/23 8:24 pm, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> On 06/11/23 6:32 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
>> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>
> I am seeing a build failure with perf:
>
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function evlist__add_aux_dummy:
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:31: error: implicit declaration of function
> evlist__dummy_event; did you mean evlist__add_sb_event’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 266 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | evlist__add_sb_event
>
>
> I think we should drop these three commits:
>
> 20a5799cae7dc perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event
> 7de783c81c7e7 perf tools: Get rid of evlist__add_on_all_cpus()
> 141ce9207068e perf evlist: Add evlist__add_dummy_on_all_cpus()
>
I have reverted these three commits locally and triggered the tests.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> Backport was requested here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAL715WLTjMGQrhm6wWqFSeL_Oq-HzoQd5CqewvLRLv0Xbnibgw@mail.gmail.com/
>
>
> Thanks,
> Harshit
>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 14:54 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-11-06 17:08 ` Allen Pais
2023-11-07 15:33 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2023-11-07 20:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-11-07 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harshit Mogalapalli
Cc: stable, Sasha Levin, mizhang, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds,
akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh,
f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, Vegard Nossum,
Darren Kenny
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 08:24:43PM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> On 06/11/23 6:32 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> > There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> I am seeing a build failure with perf:
>
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function evlist__add_aux_dummy:
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:31: error: implicit declaration of function
> evlist__dummy_event; did you mean evlist__add_sb_event’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 266 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | evlist__add_sb_event
>
>
> I think we should drop these three commits:
>
> 20a5799cae7dc perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event
> 7de783c81c7e7 perf tools: Get rid of evlist__add_on_all_cpus()
> 141ce9207068e perf evlist: Add evlist__add_dummy_on_all_cpus()
Thanks, I've dropped all of these from 5.15.y and 5.10.y now.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:02 [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 14:54 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2023-11-06 17:23 ` SeongJae Park
2023-11-07 8:56 ` Ron Economos
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2023-11-06 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, damon, SeongJae Park
Hello,
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:02:40 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] ec134bfabca0 ("Linux 5.15.138-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:02 [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-06 14:54 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-11-06 17:23 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2023-11-07 8:56 ` Ron Economos
2023-11-07 11:43 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-11-07 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor
On 11/6/23 5:02 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:02 [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 8:56 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-11-07 11:43 ` Jon Hunter
2023-11-07 15:37 ` Shuah Khan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-11-07 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, linux-tegra, stable
On Mon, 06 Nov 2023 14:02:40 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
102 tests: 102 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.138-rc1-gec134bfabca0
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:02 [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 11:43 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2023-11-07 15:37 ` Shuah Khan
2023-11-07 17:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-11-07 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, Shuah Khan
On 11/6/23 06:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:02 [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 15:37 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-11-07 17:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
2023-11-07 17:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-11-07 18:55 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo B. Marliere @ 2023-11-07 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
On 23/11/06 02:02PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
No regressions on my system.
Tested-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <ricardo@marliere.net>
Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:02 [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 17:15 ` Ricardo B. Marliere
@ 2023-11-07 17:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-11-07 18:55 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-11-07 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 18:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.138-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: ec134bfabca018727b246a05cbd7d2da66864974
* git describe: v5.15.137-129-gec134bfabca0
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.137-129-gec134bfabca0
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.137)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.137)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.137)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.137)
## Test result summary
total: 90364, pass: 72614, fail: 2502, skip: 15189, xfail: 59
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 111 total, 111 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 43 total, 43 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
2023-11-06 13:02 [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-11-07 17:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-11-07 18:55 ` Guenter Roeck
7 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-11-07 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 02:02:40PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 160 pass: 158 fail: 2
Failed builds:
i386:tools/perf
x86_64:tools/perf
Qemu test results:
total: 509 pass: 509 fail: 0
The perf build failures have already been reported, so I won't go
into detail.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread