From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04CAC4332F for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 22:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233156AbjKFWhF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:37:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51296 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232478AbjKFWhD (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:37:03 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F73EAF for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0757C433C8; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 22:37:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1699310221; bh=KnWg66fiIqkuYC0T/uFVfOj96qkrkHSpP3jCOZgXqgQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TLEuc1hkIODtMEb3BiwZxEdqxQNP2v/9+Vxrf9wO1ngAh2Y9Sh1qOna8RrRNd+nl0 Sl7vPPFM8PF5IvkFwHXWdS0URA4bjMwiAY32r4Hv4GgiYbKRqiefcu6nzpz9kXXph6 dAFD2AKiRFIwjLT78caEFOCL9/THb1cmSJnXMXB23XOtsffvaFemIP7RohRuXBYT1x /fianyyDso/TKsa42ivVLRJShe5XenZ6araTmF1UXty05qjIU2QVTPH3yLCCXYGBsG LAdsaEnxlVkS1jTGmAAPoAmUvD7Sq27ekga6JWMh9wQO1CLZsgqiapUU9zVryStzBi mO0nCwIefHa5Q== Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 14:36:59 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Dae R. Jeong" Cc: borisp@nvidia.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ywchoi@casys.kaist.ac.kr Subject: Re: Missing a write memory barrier in tls_init() Message-ID: <20231106143659.12e0d126@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 16:11:29 +0900 Dae R. Jeong wrote: > In addition, I believe the {tls_setsockopt, tls_getsockopt} > implementation is fine because of the address dependency. I think > load-load reordering is prohibited in this case so we don't need a > read barrier. Sounds plausible, could you send a patch? The smb_wmb() would be better placed in tls_init(), IMHO.