From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5122EC4167B for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232607AbjKHO1C (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:27:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45952 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235197AbjKHO0r (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:26:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BAEE1FDF; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9d10972e63eso1043321866b.2; Wed, 08 Nov 2023 06:26:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699453604; x=1700058404; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iVBE77VBxR9IpyvzgJwRw9S64V6IXgaNTy2Pl9D2aH4=; b=UJoPBWH6+W2CAHH5y8m1Icgpb6XSkEa4ul0VKgPScbxUyjhNm6ppRHZwR1v8/XmSo4 1K474XafrnJZ1J3/WFx3Ol29uUP23hJyGXPDpkdZrLNaCfTEiAx1YW/AWsr8TjENJ8Ru Lnosn4RZstdI1N/1KZhNxfyakIVpgfgSONSXYVwdi7heu0oMRQP7niPxPsc7VbXEfIbD Eb8C3MlkE1I1xkvYyLKfCtJX6ugSbY4Yza4m7QQil68m+hJnxHkjmV4tsJuNMwEr1lf2 sZhuEnOUIOOndcKS/lUjrLJ9liVKoXMDh87okgbqzEklZ/G+jCoBa0YoGs3xAOOZgbOV y4Ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699453604; x=1700058404; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=iVBE77VBxR9IpyvzgJwRw9S64V6IXgaNTy2Pl9D2aH4=; b=lCA/CkcbMtX8bY0YWRaUzngtaDTLTQrSHURqImNvprQprT0ukJIRLV3EpFukhAiJok axIobgKnA+3qgSgwhrmedOgqjS3khQXB7k/OUYr86xBoUKn9qbxlKzsV/yo57sEh8Oyl SCidC5R17vUsbHQ7lgtUchb1Iuq1e8++pnasyuVHonXbpjuCQk9eB8P1YJo9Kp/a69CT PdtYEPlnu1aZQnRtyVI0goZTK7gbpBoY+Y4tpxZVR3a489zgbJRxCiSL5Vd8cQ9uTIjB i5YUT5fzSyaSHr9LK8bR4JsA8yD4gcE6ub50xybFSDk9I/6N7MrDTWaaShP1G/fvoYZI UmBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz/kHZNbqmW4naRg0CpHCnwtwzxL4+WI3L9egtdEeo+vULaawh7 aCQMQl2TmWKNXsclDsWOS0Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGeu2yOuVGSxMaBwyf6wUUUWNLB7feoE7z9tAd1EQvhOpC3cE3veLdFXFYH4H49MAE6ulIGJA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6d13:b0:9bf:65b0:1122 with SMTP id sa19-20020a1709076d1300b009bf65b01122mr1702011ejc.69.1699453603434; Wed, 08 Nov 2023 06:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([188.26.57.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q24-20020a1709066b1800b009b2ca104988sm1136317ejr.98.2023.11.08.06.26.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Nov 2023 06:26:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:26:40 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Linus Walleij Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= , Andrew Lunn , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/4] net: ethernet: cortina: Fix MTU max setting Message-ID: <20231108142640.tmly4ifgsoeo7m3e@skbuf> References: <20231107-gemini-largeframe-fix-v3-0-e3803c080b75@linaro.org> <20231107-gemini-largeframe-fix-v3-1-e3803c080b75@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231107-gemini-largeframe-fix-v3-1-e3803c080b75@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:54:26AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > The RX max frame size is over 10000 for the Gemini ethernet, > but the TX max frame size is actually just 2047 (0x7ff after > checking the datasheet). Reflect this in what we offer to Linux, > cap the MTU at the TX max frame minus ethernet headers. > > Use the BIT() macro for related bit flags so these TX settings > are consistent. What does this second paragraph intend to say? The patch doesn't use the BIT() macro.