Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/vsprintf: Fix %pfwf when current node refcount == 0

[Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>]

Hi Sakari,

On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 11:28:43 +0000
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> > --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> > +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> > @@ -2108,8 +2108,8 @@ char *fwnode_full_name_string(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, char *buf,
> >  {
> >  	int depth;
> >  
> > -	/* Loop starting from the root node to the current node. */
> > -	for (depth = fwnode_count_parents(fwnode); depth >= 0; depth--) {
> > +	/* Loop starting from the root node to the parent of current node. */
> > +	for (depth = fwnode_count_parents(fwnode); depth > 0; depth--) {
> >  		struct fwnode_handle *__fwnode =
> >  			fwnode_get_nth_parent(fwnode, depth);  
> 
> How about, without changing the loop:
> 
> 		/*
> 		 * Only get a reference for other nodes, fwnode refcount
> 		 * may be 0 here.
> 		 */
> 		struct fwnode_handle *__fwnode =
> 			depth ? fwnode_get_nth_parent(fwnode, depth) : fwnode;
> 
> >  
> > @@ -2121,6 +2121,16 @@ char *fwnode_full_name_string(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, char *buf,
> >  		fwnode_handle_put(__fwnode);  
> 
> And:
> 
> 		if (__fwnode != fwnode)
> 			fwnode_handle_put(__fwnode);
> 

Sure.
I will just change to keep the both tests consistent.
I mean test with depth or test with __fwnode != fwnode but avoid
mixing them.

What do you think about testing using depth in all cases and so:
	if (depth)
		fwnode_handle_put(__fwnode);

Best regards,
Hervé