public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_IRQ_ENABLE leaking timer reprogram
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 16:52:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231115155232.GD8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231115151325.6262-3-frederic@kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:13:23AM -0500, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> intel_idle_irq() re-enables IRQs very early. As a result, an interrupt
> may fire before mwait() is eventually called. If such an interrupt queues
> a timer, it may go unnoticed until mwait returns and the idle loop
> handles the tick re-evaluation. And monitoring TIF_NEED_RESCHED doesn't
> help because a local timer enqueue doesn't set that flag.
> 
> The issue is mitigated by the fact that this idle handler is only invoked
> for shallow C-states when, presumably, the next tick is supposed to be
> close enough. There may still be rare cases though when the next tick
> is far away and the selected C-state is shallow, resulting in a timer
> getting ignored for a while.
> 
> Fix this with using sti_mwait() whose IRQ-reenablement only triggers
> upon calling mwait(), dealing with the race while keeping the interrupt
> latency within acceptable bounds.
> 
> Fixes: c227233ad64c (intel_idle: enable interrupts before C1 on Xeons)
> Not-yet-signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Feel free to change to normal SOB, I'm assuming it actually compiles and
works by now :-)

> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h | 11 +++++++++--
>  drivers/idle/intel_idle.c    | 19 +++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> index 341ee4f1d91e..920426d691ce 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> @@ -124,8 +124,15 @@ static __always_inline void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long eax, unsigned lo
>  		}
>  
>  		__monitor((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
> -		if (!need_resched())
> -			__mwait(eax, ecx);
> +
> +		if (!need_resched()) {
> +			if (ecx & 1) {
> +				__mwait(eax, ecx);
> +			} else {
> +				__sti_mwait(eax, ecx);
> +				raw_local_irq_disable();
> +			}
> +		}
>  	}
>  	current_clr_polling();
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> index dcda0afecfc5..3e01a6b23e75 100644
> --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> @@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ static unsigned int mwait_substates __initdata;
>  #define MWAIT2flg(eax) ((eax & 0xFF) << 24)
>  
>  static __always_inline int __intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> -					struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
> +					struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> +					int index, bool irqoff)
>  {
>  	struct cpuidle_state *state = &drv->states[index];
>  	unsigned long eax = flg2MWAIT(state->flags);
> -	unsigned long ecx = 1; /* break on interrupt flag */
> +	unsigned long ecx = 1*irqoff; /* break on interrupt flag */
>  
>  	mwait_idle_with_hints(eax, ecx);
>  
> @@ -159,19 +160,13 @@ static __always_inline int __intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  static __cpuidle int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  				struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
>  {
> -	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
> +	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
>  }
>  
>  static __cpuidle int intel_idle_irq(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  				    struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	raw_local_irq_enable();
> -	ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
> -	raw_local_irq_disable();
> -
> -	return ret;
> +	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, false);
>  }
>  
>  static __cpuidle int intel_idle_ibrs(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> @@ -184,7 +179,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle_ibrs(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  	if (smt_active)
>  		__update_spec_ctrl(0);
>  
> -	ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
> +	ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
>  
>  	if (smt_active)
>  		__update_spec_ctrl(spec_ctrl);
> @@ -196,7 +191,7 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle_xstate(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>  				       struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
>  {
>  	fpu_idle_fpregs();
> -	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
> +	return __intel_idle(dev, drv, index, true);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.42.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-15 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-15 15:13 [PATCH 0/4] x86/cpuidle fixes and optimization Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: Add a comment about the "magic" behind shadow sti before mwait Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-29 14:55   ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_IRQ_ENABLE leaking timer reprogram Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:52   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-11-15 15:57     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-29 14:55   ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-30 11:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-12-12 13:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: Remove __current_clr_polling() from mwait_idle() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-16 15:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-11-16 18:48     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-11-15 15:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: Remove the current_clr_polling() call upon mwait exit Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231115155232.GD8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox