From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59245C61D9B for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344261AbjKVNxD (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2023 08:53:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47922 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344253AbjKVNxC (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2023 08:53:02 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC35D45; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 05:52:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700661178; x=1732197178; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=M2EGjnpNn/aObs0x8/VhvdJ9roagkAJxzwT567tgnuc=; b=DTw+Gboq2Gc1Pi9MNcewLID0Ovw/cPpCBfcow8gFfwx9XWdZ15CYyRkI zF31VE2Zq5HmSdCZ5RdZSt8ogEjlztD8/KUmexSPKmGlgCK/dTRL883Zx sGKxCS8Bg8PcWEfagG9PN7AiX36OM3Q0DYt/HB+ZI5aC28Lz+HCzBnGnu O0qCgEynG/Q7CuGfLvLSBjYanvpqrMjn5kKFFWJNzEscav5X72WEaCLOL TSGbIeEKfkL/F2iYYEx2Xuy+7SWkzjWd6MePs1wOcG2lOLtJQgTAyaIch 3bSr1TKOK0qgm/lSATShkoNlneq0em6whFolT0T/V8YbiEiiezNdmuEAI g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10901"; a="423146260" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,219,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="423146260" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2023 05:52:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10901"; a="1014239951" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,219,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="1014239951" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2023 05:52:55 -0800 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 81471387; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:52:54 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:52:54 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Raag Jadav Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] pinctrl: intel: use the correct _PM_OPS() export macro Message-ID: <20231122135254.GY1074920@black.fi.intel.com> References: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231122105401.11006-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 04:24:01PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using > EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_SLEEP_PM_OPS() macro, so that the compiler can > discard it in case CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n. > > Fixes: b10a74b5c0c1 ("pinctrl: intel: Provide Intel pin control wide PM ops structure") > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav Acked-by: Mika Westerberg