From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH V5 13/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Cleanup SSRAM discovery
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:03:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231123040355.82139-14-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231123040355.82139-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Clean up the code handling SSRAM discovery. Handle all resource allocation
and cleanup in pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(). Return the error status from this
function but only fail the init if we fail to discover the primary PMC.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
---
V5 - Use single function to handle SSRAM discovery of all PMCs.
V4 - Add checking the return value from pmc_core_sram_init() to mtl.c
- Use iounmap cleanup from io.h
V3 - New patch split from previous PATCH 2
- Update changelog
- Use cleanup.h to cleanup ioremap
V2 - no change
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c | 60 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c
index 815950713e25..cb44394d88ce 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
*
*/
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
@@ -65,44 +66,49 @@ pmc_core_pmc_add(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, u64 pwrm_base,
return 0;
}
-static void
-pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, void __iomem *ssram, u32 offset,
- int pmc_idx)
+static int
+pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, int pmc_idx, u32 offset)
{
- u64 pwrm_base;
+ struct pci_dev *ssram_pcidev = pmcdev->ssram_pcidev;
+ void __iomem __free(iounmap) *tmp_ssram = NULL;
+ void __iomem __free(iounmap) *ssram = NULL;
+ const struct pmc_reg_map *map;
+ u64 ssram_base, pwrm_base;
u16 devid;
- if (pmc_idx != PMC_IDX_SOC) {
- u64 ssram_base = get_base(ssram, offset);
+ if (!pmcdev->regmap_list)
+ return -ENOENT;
- if (!ssram_base)
- return;
+ ssram_base = ssram_pcidev->resource[0].start;
+ tmp_ssram = ioremap(ssram_base, SSRAM_HDR_SIZE);
+ if (pmc_idx != PMC_IDX_MAIN) {
+ /*
+ * The secondary PMC BARS (which are behind hidden PCI devices)
+ * are read from fixed offsets in MMIO of the primary PMC BAR.
+ */
+ ssram_base = get_base(tmp_ssram, offset);
ssram = ioremap(ssram_base, SSRAM_HDR_SIZE);
if (!ssram)
- return;
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ } else {
+ ssram = no_free_ptr(tmp_ssram);
}
pwrm_base = get_base(ssram, SSRAM_PWRM_OFFSET);
devid = readw(ssram + SSRAM_DEVID_OFFSET);
- if (pmcdev->regmap_list) {
- const struct pmc_reg_map *map;
+ map = pmc_core_find_regmap(pmcdev->regmap_list, devid);
+ if (!map)
+ return -ENODEV;
- map = pmc_core_find_regmap(pmcdev->regmap_list, devid);
- if (map)
- pmc_core_pmc_add(pmcdev, pwrm_base, map, pmc_idx);
- }
-
- if (pmc_idx != PMC_IDX_SOC)
- iounmap(ssram);
+ return pmc_core_pmc_add(pmcdev, pwrm_base, map, PMC_IDX_MAIN);
}
int pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
{
- void __iomem *ssram;
struct pci_dev *pcidev;
- u64 ssram_base;
int ret;
pcidev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(20, 2));
@@ -113,18 +119,14 @@ int pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
if (ret)
goto release_dev;
- ssram_base = pcidev->resource[0].start;
- ssram = ioremap(ssram_base, SSRAM_HDR_SIZE);
- if (!ssram)
- goto disable_dev;
-
pmcdev->ssram_pcidev = pcidev;
- pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, ssram, 0, PMC_IDX_SOC);
- pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, ssram, SSRAM_IOE_OFFSET, PMC_IDX_IOE);
- pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, ssram, SSRAM_PCH_OFFSET, PMC_IDX_PCH);
+ ret = pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, PMC_IDX_MAIN, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ goto disable_dev;
- iounmap(ssram);
+ pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, PMC_IDX_IOE, SSRAM_IOE_OFFSET);
+ pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, PMC_IDX_PCH, SSRAM_PCH_OFFSET);
return 0;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-23 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-23 4:03 [PATCH V5 00/20] intel_pmc: Add telemetry API to read counters David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 01/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Fix xa_alloc memory leak David E. Box
2023-11-23 11:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 15:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 02/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Move structures to header David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 03/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: remove platform_info from vsec device structure David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 04/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Use cleanup.h David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 05/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Assign auxdev parent by argument David E. Box
2023-11-23 11:29 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 06/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add intel_vsec_register David E. Box
2023-11-23 15:24 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 07/20] platform/x86/intel/vsec: Add base address field David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 08/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add header to struct intel_pmt_entry David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 09/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: telemetry: Export API to read telemetry David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 10/20] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Call pmc_get_low_power_modes from platform init David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 11/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Allow pmc_core_ssram_init to fail David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 12/20] asm-generic/io.h: iounmap/ioport_unmap cleanup.h support David E. Box
2023-11-23 14:30 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 16:23 ` David E. Box
2023-11-28 1:55 ` David E. Box
2023-11-29 8:45 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-10 15:24 ` Baoquan He
2023-11-24 9:49 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-23 4:03 ` David E. Box [this message]
2023-11-23 14:26 ` [PATCH V5 13/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Cleanup SSRAM discovery Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 14/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc/mtl: Use return value from pmc_core_ssram_init() David E. Box
2023-11-23 14:26 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 15/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Find and register PMC telemetry entries David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 16/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Display LPM requirements for multiple PMCs David E. Box
2023-11-23 14:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 17/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Retrieve LPM information using Intel PMT David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 18/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Read low power mode requirements for MTL-M and MTL-P David E. Box
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 19/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add debug attribute for Die C6 counter David E. Box
2023-11-23 11:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 13:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-23 4:03 ` [PATCH V5 20/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Show Die C6 counter on Meteor Lake David E. Box
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231123040355.82139-14-david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).