From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
Cc: Viacheslav Bocharov <adeep@lexina.in>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
<oxffffaa@gmail.com>, <kernel@sberdevices.ru>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB layout
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:06:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124100657.245d258f@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab3f6734-357c-9937-2e21-a935850d3af8@salutedevices.com>
Hi Arseniy,
avkrasnov@salutedevices.com wrote on Fri, 24 Nov 2023 10:50:54 +0300:
> Hello all, 2 weeks from 9.11, please ping
I'm waiting for Viacheslav.
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
>
>
> On 09.11.2023 12:09, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> > Hello, thanks for review!
> >
> > On 09.11.2023 11:06, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2023-11-09 at 08:39 +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >>> In case of MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB mode, MTD/NAND layer fills/reads OOB buffer
> >>> according current OOB layout so we need to follow it in the driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 4 ++--
> >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> index 561d46d860b7..0d4d358152d7 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> >>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_set_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>> __le64 *info;
> >>> int i, count;
> >>>
> >>> - for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> + for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>> info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>> *info |= oob_buf[count];
> >>> *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> >> Seems something wrong with your logic here.
> >> I think this code should most likely look like this:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >> info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >> *info |= oob_buf[count];
> >> if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >> *info |= oob_buf[count + 1] << 8;
> >> }
> >
> > For 64 bytes OOB and 512 bytes ECC this driver reports free areas as:
> >
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> > AA AA BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB BB
> >
> > where AA is free byte(user byte), BB - ECC codes. So to access user bytes
> > we need bytes 0,1,16,17,32,33,48,49. nand->ecc.bytes == 14, so 'count' is
> > increased at 16 every iteration, so i guess this is correct.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Thanks, Arseniy
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_get_user_byte(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *oob_buf)
> >>> __le64 *info;
> >>> int i, count;
> >>>
> >>> - for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += 2) {
> >>> + for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += (2 + nand->ecc.bytes)) {
> >>> info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >>> oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >>> oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> >> And there:
> >>
> >> for (i = 0, count = 0; i < nand->ecc.steps; i++, count += nand->ecc.bytes) {
> >> info = &meson_chip->info_buf[i];
> >> oob_buf[count] = *info;
> >> if (nand->ecc.bytes > 1)
> >> oob_buf[count + 1] = *info >> 8;
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >> This is more similar to the behavior of similar functions in the proprietary U-Boot.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Viacheslav Bocharov
> >>
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-24 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-09 5:39 [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: meson: handle OOB buffer according OOB layout Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-09 8:06 ` Viacheslav Bocharov
2023-11-09 9:09 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-24 7:50 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-11-24 9:06 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2023-11-24 10:14 ` Viacheslav
2023-11-30 10:36 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231124100657.245d258f@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=adeep@lexina.in \
--cc=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox