From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
andre.draszik@linaro.org, quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Avoid more races around device probe
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:35:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231124153520.GA558245@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16f433658661d7cadfea51e7c65da95826112a2b.1700071477.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 06:25:44PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> It turns out there are more subtle races beyond just the main part of
> __iommu_probe_device() itself running in parallel - the dev_iommu_free()
> on the way out of an unsuccessful probe can still manage to trip up
> concurrent accesses to a device's fwspec. Thus, extend the scope of
> iommu_probe_device_lock() to also serialise fwspec creation and initial
> retrieval.
>
> Reported-by: Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/e2e20e1c-6450-4ac5-9804-b0000acdf7de@quicinc.com/
Apparently this is "Closes:" nowadays
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index f17a1113f3d6..e0c962648dde 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -485,11 +485,12 @@ static void iommu_deinit_device(struct device *dev)
> dev_iommu_free(dev);
> }
>
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_probe_device_lock);
> +
Please put this at the top of the file with the other declarations, I
will rebase the lockdep annotations from the other series
Thanks,
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-24 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-15 18:25 [PATCH] iommu: Avoid more races around device probe Robin Murphy
2023-11-16 17:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-22 14:44 ` Greg KH
2023-11-22 19:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-11-27 9:57 ` Joerg Roedel
2023-11-20 11:26 ` André Draszik
2023-11-24 15:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231124153520.GA558245@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox