From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Petr Malat <oss@malat.biz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bootconfig: Apply early options from embedded config
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 07:46:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231127074630.993db80be06f03067d8a1aef@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWADKWURCDZXyJTQ@ntb.petris.klfree.czf>
Hi Petr,
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 02:58:01 +0100
Petr Malat <oss@malat.biz> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 07:41:06PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 00:13:42 +0100
> > Petr Malat <oss@malat.biz> wrote:
> > > + static int prev_rtn __initdata;
> >
> > I would rather like 'done_retval' instead of 'prev_rtn'.
>
> OK, I will rename it.
>
> > > - /* Cut out the bootconfig data even if we have no bootconfig option */
> > > - initrd_data = get_boot_config_from_initrd(&initrd_size);
> > > - /* If there is no bootconfig in initrd, try embedded one. */
> > > - if (!initrd_data || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED_APPEND_INITRD))
> > > - embeded_data = xbc_get_embedded_bootconfig(&embeded_size);
> > > + if (prev_rtn)
> > > + return prev_rtn;
> > >
> > > + embeded_data = xbc_get_embedded_bootconfig(&embeded_size);
> > > strscpy(tmp_cmdline, boot_command_line, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
> > > err = parse_args("bootconfig", tmp_cmdline, NULL, 0, 0, 0, NULL,
> > > bootconfig_params);
> >
> > This copy & check should be skipped if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE) because
> > this only checks "bootconfig" is in the cmdline.
> > Can you introduce following flag and initialize it here?
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE
> > #define bootconfig_enabled (true)
> > #else
> > static bool bootconfig_enabled __initdata;
> > #endif
>
> Even when CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE is set, we must call parse_args to find
> the location of -- to know where init options should be added. It's done the
> same way in the current code.
Ah, got it.
>
>
> > > -
> > > - if (IS_ERR(err) || !(bootconfig_found || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE)))
> > > - return;
> > > -
> > > + if (IS_ERR(err) || !(bootconfig_found || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_FORCE))) {
> > > + prev_rtn = embeded_data ? -ENOMSG : -ENODATA;
> > > + return prev_rtn;
> >
> > Than we don't need to set a strange error value...
>
> It's used for error logging as the current code emits a different
> messages in these situations, but I will try to refactor it.
Yeah, I recommend you to set a global flag if initializing something.
> > > + }
> > > /* parse_args() stops at the next param of '--' and returns an address */
> > > if (err)
> > > initargs_offs = err - tmp_cmdline;
> > >
> > > - if (!initrd_data && !embeded_data) {
> > > - /* If user intended to use bootconfig, show an error level message */
> > > - if (bootconfig_found)
> > > - pr_err("'bootconfig' found on command line, but no bootconfig found\n");
> > > - else
> > > - pr_info("No bootconfig data provided, so skipping bootconfig");
> > > - return;
> > > + if (!embeded_data) {
> > > + prev_rtn = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> >
> > Also, we can recheck xbc_get_embedded_bootconfig(&embeded_size) later instead of
> > using this error code.
>
> ok, I will try to refactor the error logging. Calling
> xbc_get_embedded_bootconfig is cheap.
Yes.
>
> > > + return prev_rtn;
> > > }
> > >
> > > ret = xbc_init(embeded_data, embeded_size, &msg, &pos);
> > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > - goto err0;
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + boot_config_pr_err(msg, pos, "embedded");
> > > + prev_rtn = ret;
> > > + return prev_rtn;
> > > + }
> > > + prev_rtn = 1;
> >
> > This function should be splitted into init_embedded_boot_config() and
> > apply_boot_config_early(). The latter one should not be called twice.
> >
> > > .....
> > > +
> > > +static void __init setup_boot_config(void)
> > > +{
> > > + const char *msg, *initrd_data;
> > > + int pos, ret;
> > > + size_t initrd_size, s;
> > > +
> > > + /* Cut out the bootconfig data even if we have no bootconfig option */
> > > + initrd_data = get_boot_config_from_initrd(&initrd_size);
> > > +
> > > + ret = setup_boot_config_early();
> >
> > Because you should not apply early_params here, you need to call only
> > init_embedded_boot_config() here.
>
> setup_boot_config_early() must be called from 2 places, because there is
> no guarantee the architecture specific code calls parse_early_param() - it's
> not mandatory. If it's not called by architecture, it's called quite late
> by start_kernel(), later than setup_boot_config().
Right. I meant that you can skip the second one if the first one is
called.
> I want to avoid different behavior on different architectures, so I always
> process early options in the embedded config only, although on some
> architectures even these from initrd could be used, but it could cause
> issues in the future if the architecture would need to switch.
Ah, I got it. There are 2 cases.
- If setup_arch() calls parse_early_param(), the 2nd setup_boot_config_early()
in the setup_boot_config() will do nothing.
- If setup_arch() does not call parse_early_param(), the 1st
setup_boot_config_early() in the setup_boot_config() will apply early params
but the 2nd setup_boot_config_early() in the parse_early_param() will do nothing.
OK. And can you write a comment it?
>
>
> > > + if (ret == -ENOMSG || (ret == -ENODATA && initrd_data)) {
> >
> > Also, this can be
> > if (!bootconfig_enabled) {
> > if (initrd_data || xbc_get_embedded_bootconfig(&s))
> >
> > > + pr_info("Bootconfig data present, but handling is disabled\n");
> > > + return;
> >
> >
> > > + } else if (ret == -ENODATA) {
> > > + /* Bootconfig disabled and bootconfig data are not present */
> > > + return;
> >
> > this can be removed.
> >
> > > + } else if (ret == -ENOPROTOOPT) {
> >
> > This should be
> >
> > } else {
> >
> > > + /* Embedded bootconfig not found */
> > > + if (!initrd_data) {
> > > + pr_err("'bootconfig' found on command line, but no bootconfig data found\n");
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > + ret = xbc_init(NULL, 0, &msg, &pos);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto err0;
> >
> > > + } else if (ret < 0) {
> > > + /* Other error, should be logged already */
> > > + return;
> >
> > So this is checked at first.
> >
> > > + } else if (initrd_data && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED_APPEND_INITRD)) {
> >
> > And as I pointed, we can remove CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED_APPEND_INITRD so this case
> > should be removed.
>
> I have added BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED_APPEND_INITRD, because it's not backward
> compatible change and I didn't want to risk breaking current use cases.
> My change tries to get early options working without affecting how
> other options are handled, but I think appending the config is more
> reasonable behavior and if you do not see it as a problem to not be
> backward compatible here, I will delete the "replace" behavior.
That's a good point. OK if disabling CONFIG_BOOT_CONFIG_EMBED_APPEND_INITRD,
it must skip setting early_params to avoid "hidden setting" from the
embedded bootconfig.
Thank you,
>
> I will try to refactor the error handling.
> Petr
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-26 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-21 23:13 [PATCH 0/2] bootconfig: Support early options in embedded config Petr Malat
2023-11-21 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] bootconfig: Support appending initrd config to embedded one Petr Malat
2023-11-23 2:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-11-21 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] bootconfig: Apply early options from embedded config Petr Malat
2023-11-22 22:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-11-22 23:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-11-23 2:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-11-23 10:04 ` Petr Malat
2023-11-23 14:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-11-24 2:12 ` Petr Malat
2023-11-23 17:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-11-23 9:50 ` Petr Malat
2023-11-23 10:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-11-24 1:58 ` Petr Malat
2023-11-26 22:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2023-11-27 15:02 ` Petr Malat
2023-11-27 22:13 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2023-12-05 10:25 ` Petr Malat
2023-11-22 23:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] bootconfig: Support early options in " Paul E. McKenney
2023-11-23 1:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-07-08 21:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231127074630.993db80be06f03067d8a1aef@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss@malat.biz \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox