public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, "Søren Andersen" <san@skov.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] introduce priority-based shutdown support
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 12:36:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231127113611.GD877872@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a85b2d7e-4036-4bab-addf-45e0c2f6c335@arm.com>

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:13:49AM +0000, Christian Loehle wrote:
> > Same problem was seen not only in automotive devices, but also in
> > industrial or agricultural. With other words, it is important enough to bring
> > some kind of solution mainline.
> > 
> 
> IMO that is a serious problem with the used storage / eMMC in that case and it
> is not suitable for industrial/automotive uses?
> Any industrial/automotive-suitable storage device should detect under-voltage and
> just treat it as a power-down/loss, and while that isn't nice for the storage device,
> it really shouldn't be able to brick a device (within <1M cycles anyway).
> What does the storage module vendor say about this?

Good question. I do not have insights ATM. I'll forward it.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-27 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-24 14:53 [PATCH v1 0/3] introduce priority-based shutdown support Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-24 14:53 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: move core part of device_shutdown() to a separate function Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-24 15:07   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-24 20:04   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-24 14:53 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] driver core: introduce prioritized device shutdown sequence Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-24 15:10   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-24 14:53 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mmc: core: increase shutdown priority for MMC devices Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-24 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] introduce priority-based shutdown support Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-24 15:21   ` Mark Brown
2023-11-24 15:27     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-24 15:49       ` Mark Brown
2023-11-24 15:56         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-24 16:32           ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-24 17:26             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-24 18:57               ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-25  6:51                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-25  8:50                   ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-25  9:09                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-25 10:30                       ` Mark Brown
2023-11-25 14:35                         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-25 15:43                           ` Mark Brown
2023-11-25 19:58                             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-26 10:14                               ` Mark Brown
2023-11-26 19:31                                 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-27 11:27                                   ` Christian Loehle
2023-11-27 11:44                                     ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-27 11:57                                       ` Christian Loehle
2023-11-26 19:42                                 ` Ferry Toth
2023-11-27 14:09                                   ` Mark Brown
2023-11-27 10:13                     ` Christian Loehle
2023-11-27 11:36                       ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2023-11-30 21:59                         ` Francesco Dolcini
2023-11-27 12:54               ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-11-27 13:08                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-11-27 14:24                   ` Mark Brown
2023-11-27 14:49                   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-11-27 16:23                     ` Mark Brown
2023-11-30  9:57 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231127113611.GD877872@pengutronix.de \
    --to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=san@skov.dk \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox