public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
	Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
	Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri05@gmail.com>,
	Salam Noureddine <noureddine@arista.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] net/tcp: Don't add key with non-matching VRF on connected sockets
Date: Mon,  4 Dec 2023 19:00:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231204190044.450107-5-dima@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231204190044.450107-1-dima@arista.com>

If the connection was established, don't allow adding TCP-AO keys that
don't match the peer. Currently, there are checks for ip-address
matching, but L3 index check is missing. Add it to restrict userspace
shooting itself somewhere.

Yet, nothing restricts the CAP_NET_RAW user from trying to shoot
themselves by performing setsockopt(SO_BINDTODEVICE) or
setsockopt(SO_BINDTOIFINDEX) over an established TCP-AO connection.
So, this is just "minimum effort" to potentially save someone's
debugging time, rather than a full restriction on doing weird things.

Fixes: 248411b8cb89 ("net/tcp: Wire up l3index to TCP-AO")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c
index c8be1d526eac..18dacfef7a07 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c
@@ -1608,6 +1608,15 @@ static int tcp_ao_add_cmd(struct sock *sk, unsigned short int family,
 		if (!dev || !l3index)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
+		if (!bound_dev_if || bound_dev_if != cmd.ifindex) {
+			/* tcp_ao_established_key() doesn't expect having
+			 * non peer-matching key on an established TCP-AO
+			 * connection.
+			 */
+			if (!((1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_LISTEN | TCPF_CLOSE)))
+				return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
 		/* It's still possible to bind after adding keys or even
 		 * re-bind to a different dev (with CAP_NET_RAW).
 		 * So, no reason to return error here, rather try to be
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-04 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-04 19:00 [PATCH v5 0/7] TCP-AO fixes Dmitry Safonov
2023-12-04 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation/tcp: Fix an obvious typo Dmitry Safonov
2023-12-06 11:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-12-04 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] net/tcp: Consistently align TCP-AO option in the header Dmitry Safonov
2023-12-04 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] net/tcp: Limit TCP_AO_REPAIR to non-listen sockets Dmitry Safonov
2023-12-04 19:00 ` Dmitry Safonov [this message]
2023-12-04 19:00 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] net/tcp: Don't store TCP-AO maclen on reqsk Dmitry Safonov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231204190044.450107-5-dima@arista.com \
    --to=dima@arista.com \
    --cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fruggeri05@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noureddine@arista.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox