public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qingfang DENG <dqfext@gmail.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: introduce RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
Date: Tue,  5 Dec 2023 16:39:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231205083924.48933-1-dqfext@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231203135753.1575-2-jszhang@kernel.org>

Hi,

You may as well remove the -mstrict-align CFLAGS in the Makefile, if
this option is enabled:

--- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
@@ -108,7 +108,9 @@ KBUILD_AFLAGS_MODULE += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-mno-relax)
 # unaligned accesses.  While unaligned accesses are explicitly allowed in the
 # RISC-V ISA, they're emulated by machine mode traps on all extant
 # architectures.  It's faster to have GCC emit only aligned accesses.
+ifneq ($(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS),y)
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mstrict-align)
+endif
 
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK),y)
 prepare: stack_protector_prepare
-- 

- Qingfang

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-05  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-03 13:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] riscv: enable EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS and DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS Jisheng Zhang
2023-12-03 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: introduce RISCV_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Jisheng Zhang
2023-12-04 19:15   ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-12-05  2:14     ` Eric Biggers
2023-12-05 13:53       ` Jisheng Zhang
2023-12-05 20:56         ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-12-06  0:05           ` Charles Lohr
2023-12-06 16:19             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-12-05  8:39   ` Qingfang DENG [this message]
2023-12-22  5:04     ` Eric Biggers
2023-12-03 13:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] riscv: select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS for efficient unaligned access HW Jisheng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231205083924.48933-1-dqfext@gmail.com \
    --to=dqfext@gmail.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox