From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Naresh Maramaina <quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
chu.stanley@gmail.com, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, quic_cang@quicinc.com,
quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com, Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] ufs: core: Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 21:02:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231206153242.GI12802@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9373252-710c-4a54-95cc-046314796960@quicinc.com>
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 07:32:54PM +0530, Naresh Maramaina wrote:
>
>
> On 12/5/2023 10:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 12/4/23 21:58, Naresh Maramaina wrote:
> > > On 12/5/2023 12:30 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > On 12/4/23 06:30, Maramaina Naresh wrote:
> > > > > + /* This capability allows the host controller driver to
> > > > > use the PM QoS
> > > > > + * feature.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + UFSHCD_CAP_PM_QOS = 1 << 13,
> > > > > };
> > > >
> > > > Why does it depend on the host driver whether or not PM QoS is
> > > > enabled? Why isn't it enabled unconditionally?
> > >
> > > For some platform vendors power KPI might be more important than
> > > random io KPI. Hence this flag is disabled by default and can be
> > > enabled based on platform requirement.
> >
> > How about leaving this flag out unless if a host vendor asks explicitly
> > for this flag?
>
> IMHO, instead of completely removing this flag, how about having
> flag like "UFSHCD_CAP_DISABLE_PM_QOS" which will make PMQOS enable
> by default and if some host vendor wants to disable it explicitly,
> they can enable that flag.
> Please let me know your opinion.
>
If a vendor wants to disable this feature, then the driver has to be modified.
That won't be very convenient. So either this has to be configured through sysfs
or Kconfig if flexibility matters.
- Mani
> > > >
> > > > > + * @pm_qos_req: PM QoS request handle
> > > > > + * @pm_qos_init: flag to check if pm qos init completed
> > > > > */
> > > >
> > > > Documentation for pm_qos_init is missing.
> > > >
> > > Sorry, i didn't get your comment, i have already added documentation
> > > for @pm_qos_init, @pm_qos_req variable as above. Do you want me to
> > > add this information some where else as well?
> >
> > Oops, I meant 'qos_vote'.
>
> Sure. I'll take of this in next patchset.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bart.
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Naresh
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 14:30 [PATCH V2 0/3] Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver Maramaina Naresh
2023-12-04 14:30 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] ufs: core: " Maramaina Naresh
2023-12-04 19:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-12-05 5:58 ` Naresh Maramaina
2023-12-05 17:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-12-06 14:02 ` Naresh Maramaina
2023-12-06 15:32 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-12-07 1:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-12-07 9:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-07 10:26 ` Nitin Rawat
2023-12-07 11:21 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-11 10:00 ` Pavan Kondeti
2023-12-06 15:26 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-07 11:26 ` Naresh Maramaina
2023-12-11 9:56 ` Naresh Maramaina
2023-12-04 14:31 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] ufs: ufs-mediatek: Enable CPU latency PM QoS support for MEDIATEK SoC Maramaina Naresh
2023-12-04 14:31 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] ufs: ufs-qcom: Enable CPU latency QoS support for QCOM SoC Maramaina Naresh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231206153242.GI12802@thinkpad \
--to=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chu.stanley@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox