public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Add new bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
Date: Thu,  7 Dec 2023 15:08:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231207210843.168466-1-void@manifault.com> (raw)

It can be useful to query how many bits are set in a cpumask. For
example, if you want to perform special logic for the last remaining
core that's set in a mask. This logic is already exposed through the
main kernel's cpumask header as cpumask_weight(), so it would be useful
to add a new bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc which wraps it and does the
same.

This patch series was built and tested on top of commit 2146f7fe6e02
("Merge branch 'allocate-bpf-trampoline-on-bpf_prog_pack'").

David Vernet (2):
  bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
  selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc

 Documentation/bpf/cpumasks.rst                |  2 +-
 kernel/bpf/cpumask.c                          | 12 ++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c        |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h      |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.42.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-12-07 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-07 21:08 David Vernet [this message]
2023-12-07 21:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc David Vernet
2023-12-08  4:37   ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-07 21:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for " David Vernet
2023-12-08  4:39   ` Yonghong Song
2023-12-10  5:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Add new " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231207210843.168466-1-void@manifault.com \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox