public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria.behnsen@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] rcu/exp: Fix RCU expedited parallel grace period kworker allocation failure recovery
Date: Fri,  8 Dec 2023 23:05:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231208220545.7452-4-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208220545.7452-1-frederic@kernel.org>

Under CONFIG_RCU_EXP_KTHREAD=y, the nodes initialization for expedited
grace periods is queued to a kworker. However if the allocation of that
kworker failed, the nodes initialization is performed synchronously by
the caller instead.

Now the check for kworker initialization failure relies on the kworker
pointer to be NULL while its value might actually encapsulate an
allocation failure error.

Make sure to handle this case.

Fixes: 9621fbee44df ("rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT kthread_worker")
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 82f8130d3fe3..055f4817bc70 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4723,6 +4723,7 @@ static void __init rcu_start_exp_gp_kworkers(void)
 	rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = kthread_create_worker(0, par_gp_kworker_name);
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker)) {
 		pr_err("Failed to create %s!\n", par_gp_kworker_name);
+		rcu_exp_par_gp_kworker = NULL;
 		kthread_destroy_worker(rcu_exp_gp_kworker);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.42.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-08 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-08 22:05 [PATCH 0/8] rcu: Fix expedited GP deadlock (and cleanup some nocb stuff) Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-08 22:05 ` [PATCH 1/8] rcu/nocb: Make IRQs disablement symetric Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-13 13:01   ` Neeraj upadhyay
2023-12-08 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/8] rcu/nocb: Re-arrange call_rcu() NOCB specific code Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-08 22:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-12-12 16:04   ` [PATCH 3/8] rcu/exp: Fix RCU expedited parallel grace period kworker allocation failure recovery Kalesh Singh
2023-12-12 16:10     ` Kalesh Singh
2023-12-08 22:05 ` [PATCH 4/8] rcu/exp: Handle RCU expedited grace period kworker allocation failure Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-12 16:14   ` Kalesh Singh
2023-12-08 22:05 ` [PATCH 5/8] rcu: s/boost_kthread_mutex/kthread_mutex Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-08 22:05 ` [PATCH 6/8] rcu/exp: Make parallel exp gp kworker per rcu node Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-08 22:05 ` [PATCH 7/8] rcu/exp: Handle parallel exp gp kworkers affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-08 22:05 ` [PATCH 8/8] rcu/exp: Remove rcu_par_gp_wq Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-11 16:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] rcu: Fix expedited GP deadlock (and cleanup some nocb stuff) Paul E. McKenney
2023-12-11 20:04   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-11 21:39     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-12-12 13:34       ` Frederic Weisbecker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-19 14:08 [PATCH 0/8 v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2023-12-19 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] rcu/exp: Fix RCU expedited parallel grace period kworker allocation failure recovery Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231208220545.7452-4-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna-maria.behnsen@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox