From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de>
Cc: avri.altman@wdc.com, bvanassche@acm.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
quic_cang@quicinc.com, quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com,
beanhuo@micron.com, thomas@t-8ch.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikebi@micron.com,
lporzio@micron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add UFS RTC support
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 17:39:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231211120908.GC2894@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31f011c3d25bf63ed2b8a17ecf89f5bf70d8548c.camel@iokpp.de>
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 08:15:15PM +0100, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 23:01 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your reviews. I will incorporate the suggested
> > > > changes
> > > > into the patch, addressing all comments except for the RTC mode
> > > > switch.
> > > > The proposal is to perform the RTC mode switch during UFS
> > > > provisioning,
> > > > not at runtime in the UFS online phase. This approach ensures
> > > > that the
> > > > UFS configuration is populated based on the RTC configuration
> > > > established during provisioning. It is advisable not to change
> > > > the RTC
> > > > mode after provisioning is complete. Additionally, the usage of
> > > > tv_sec,
> > > > which returns time elapsed since boot, suggests that there is no
> > > > issue
> > > > with utilizing the RTC in this context.
> > >
> > > Except that the warning will be issued to users after each 10s for
> > > 40 years.
> > > Atleast get rid of that.
> > >
> >
> > I tried this series on Qcom RB5 board and found the issue due to the
> > usage of
> > UFSHCD_QUIRK_REINIT_AFTER_MAX_GEAR_SWITCH flag. When this flag is
> > set,
> > ufshcd_device_init() will be called twice due to reinit of the
> > controller and
> > PHY.
> >
> > Since RTC work is initialized and scheduled from
> > ufshcd_device_init(), panic
> > happens during second time. Is it possible to move RTC init outside
> > of
> > ufshcd_device_init(). Maybe you can parse RTC params in
> > ufshcd_device_init()
> > and initialize the work elsewhere. Or you can cancel the work before
> > calling
> > ufshcd_device_init() second time.
> >
> > - Mani
>
>
> Thank you for your review. I have moved the INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hba-
> >ufs_rtc_update_work, ufshcd_rtc_work) to ufshcd_init() from
> ufs_init_rtc(). This modification has been tested on the Qcom platform.
This works, thanks!
- Mani
> Regarding the warning, instead of removing it entirely, I have switched
> it to dev_dbg. This adjustment is made with the consideration that some
> form of customer notification is still necessary.
>
> changes as below:
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 953d50cc4256..cb6b0c286367 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8205,7 +8205,7 @@ static void ufshcd_update_rtc(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
> ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts64);
>
> if (ts64.tv_sec < hba->dev_info.rtc_time_baseline) {
> - dev_warn(hba->dev, "%s: Current time precedes previous
> setting!\n", __func__);
> + dev_dbg(hba->dev, "%s: Current time precedes previous
> setting!\n", __func__);
> return;
> }
> /*
> @@ -8270,8 +8270,6 @@ static void ufs_init_rtc(struct ufs_hba *hba, u8
> *desc_buf)
> * update work, and let user configure by sysfs node according
> to specific circumstance.
> */
> hba->dev_info.rtc_update_period = 0;
> -
> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hba->ufs_rtc_update_work, ufshcd_rtc_work);
> }
>
> static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> @@ -10634,8 +10632,8 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void
> __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE,
>
> UIC_LINK_HIBERN8_STATE);
>
> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work,
> - ufshcd_rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work,
> ufshcd_rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hba->ufs_rtc_update_work, ufshcd_rtc_work);
>
> /* Set the default auto-hiberate idle timer value to 150 ms */
> if (ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba) && !hba->ahit) {
>
> Kind regards,
> Bean
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-11 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 10:39 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add UFS RTC support Bean Huo
2023-12-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy() Bean Huo
2023-12-08 12:48 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add UFS RTC support Bean Huo
2023-12-08 14:50 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-08 15:12 ` Bean Huo
2023-12-08 17:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-08 17:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-10 19:15 ` Bean Huo
2023-12-11 12:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-12-10 19:28 ` Bean Huo
2023-12-11 12:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-12-08 10:39 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add sysfs node for UFS RTC update Bean Huo
2023-12-08 10:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Add UFS RTC support Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231211120908.GC2894@thinkpad \
--to=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@iokpp.de \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lporzio@micron.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mikebi@micron.com \
--cc=quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
--cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox