From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/12] iommu: Refine locking for per-device fault data management
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:50:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231211145022.GZ1489931@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231207064308.313316-12-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 02:43:07PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The per-device fault data is a data structure that is used to store
> information about faults that occur on a device. This data is allocated
> when IOPF is enabled on the device and freed when IOPF is disabled. The
> data is used in the paths of iopf reporting, handling, responding, and
> draining.
>
> The fault data is protected by two locks:
>
> - dev->iommu->lock: This lock is used to protect the allocation and
> freeing of the fault data.
> - dev->iommu->fault_parameter->lock: This lock is used to protect the
> fault data itself.
>
> Apply the locking mechanism to the fault reporting and responding paths.
>
> The fault_parameter->lock is also added in iopf_queue_discard_partial().
> It does not fix any real issue, as iopf_queue_discard_partial() is only
> used in the VT-d driver's prq_event_thread(), which is a single-threaded
> path that reports the IOPFs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/io-pgfault.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-11 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-07 6:42 [PATCH v8 00/12] iommu: Prepare to deliver page faults to user space Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:42 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] iommu: Move iommu fault data to linux/iommu.h Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:42 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove unrecoverable faults reporting Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:42 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] iommu: Remove unrecoverable fault data Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] iommu: Cleanup iopf data structure definitions Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] iommu: Merge iopf_device_param into iommu_fault_param Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] iommu: Remove iommu_[un]register_device_fault_handler() Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] iommu: Merge iommu_fault_event and iopf_fault Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] iommu: Prepare for separating SVA and IOPF Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] iommu: Make iommu_queue_iopf() more generic Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] iommu: Separate SVA and IOPF Lu Baolu
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] iommu: Refine locking for per-device fault data management Lu Baolu
2023-12-11 14:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-12-07 6:43 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] iommu: Use refcount for fault data access Lu Baolu
2023-12-11 15:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 3:44 ` Baolu Lu
2023-12-12 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-11 15:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-12 5:07 ` Baolu Lu
2023-12-12 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-13 2:19 ` Baolu Lu
2023-12-12 5:17 ` Baolu Lu
2023-12-12 15:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-12-13 2:14 ` Baolu Lu
2023-12-12 5:23 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231211145022.GZ1489931@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liulongfang@huawei.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox