From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05C8535263 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 03:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PlsddIeC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1702697283; x=1734233283; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=vbBASBiJaH4THpMtwHkToEZ+1eMr/8HKB5TNd5kuKi0=; b=PlsddIeCQUFLNasBUTOVp8F87Siew7dCbxvvbKCKyt9WCmkoQIoYFWkk n2rCbeOMZvmdID9+TE+A2HDjbo+o9DjqYOYF+QyPH98cdVjavW3P7lZx0 nS93M3zLN9K1tlrjomzq9hYGbNSzu7I00ulrIQ0cOB6Hmxm79N91plCK5 mOXEFggWjih700k/lA18uJPxLxK68iuMRCBMT2mTIm09cUFUuhoS2cqnX Wlz5ozZKfkdemGnLxrkoJerewL+6bZJRmL1Wu5UEg1HpNa0wuynloo9B+ YiQeW56qO0dEDIW84yuMG9RT89GRSdeFeH/0/by+o6ynsbGOQR2VreYCP A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10925"; a="8712139" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,280,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="8712139" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Dec 2023 19:28:02 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10925"; a="1106321452" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,280,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="1106321452" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2023 19:27:59 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rELLI-00016E-2j; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 03:27:56 +0000 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 11:27:36 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Maksim Davydov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, davydov-max@yandex-team.ru, den-plotnikov@yandex-team.ru, tony.luck@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/split_lock: add split lock counter Message-ID: <202312161122.4Y1qkw0S-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231215140113.57173-1-davydov-max@yandex-team.ru> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231215140113.57173-1-davydov-max@yandex-team.ru> Hi Maksim, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/x86/core] [also build test WARNING on tip/master tip/sched/core linus/master tip/auto-latest v6.7-rc5 next-20231215] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maksim-Davydov/x86-split_lock-add-split-lock-counter/20231215-220639 base: tip/x86/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215140113.57173-1-davydov-max%40yandex-team.ru patch subject: [PATCH] x86/split_lock: add split lock counter config: um-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312161122.4Y1qkw0S-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312161122.4Y1qkw0S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312161122.4Y1qkw0S-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/proc/base.c:101: >> arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:36:31: warning: 'struct cpuinfo_x86' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 36 | int mwait_usable(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:42:37: warning: 'struct cpuinfo_x86' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 42 | extern void __init sld_setup(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:85:32: warning: 'struct cpuinfo_x86' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 85 | void init_ia32_feat_ctl(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ vim +36 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h bb6e89df9028b2 Thomas Gleixner 2022-04-15 35 1c9d16e3591109 Borislav Petkov 2011-02-11 @36 int mwait_usable(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *); 6d652ea1d05639 Jaswinder Singh Rajput 2009-01-07 37 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki