From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41EC101DB;
	Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:33:14 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
	id DE8E168AFE; Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:33:09 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:33:09 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] block: remove support for the host aware zone model
Message-ID: <20231218143309.GA16810@lst.de>
References: <20231217165359.604246-1-hch@lst.de> <20231217165359.604246-4-hch@lst.de> <09f1adfe-90b5-445c-b7f6-ae4fc7a9666a@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <09f1adfe-90b5-445c-b7f6-ae4fc7a9666a@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 06:48:43PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > -	if (devip->zmodel == BLK_ZONED_HA)
> > -		arr[4] = 1 << 4;	/* zoned field = 01b */
> 
> I think we should keep everything related to HA in scsi debug as that is an easy
> way to test the block layer and scsi. no ?

Yes.